Add to ORKGThe Supreme Court of the United States has held that there is a federal cause of action founded directly on the fourth amendment against federal agents who have conducted an illegal search and seizure. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the fourth amendment does not require that a Title III...
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii has held that damages are recoverable in...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Jeffers v. United States, 187 F. 2d 498 (D. C. Cir. 1950); aff\u27d. __ U. S. __, 20 U. S. L. Week 4...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a warrantless search and seizure, if authorized...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
A member of the Metropolitan Police of Washington, D.C. entered the hotel room of A and B for the pu...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The defendant was in the unlawful possession of narcotics. Having been given a key by his two aunts ...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search warrant based on information from an anonymou...
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel ro...
Petitioners, suspected of carrying on an illegal lottery, had been under police observation for seve...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable to the states through the fourtee...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the fourth amendment does not require that a Title III...
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii has held that damages are recoverable in...
The most important step in the development of this constitutional provision came in 1886 in the famo...
Jeffers v. United States, 187 F. 2d 498 (D. C. Cir. 1950); aff\u27d. __ U. S. __, 20 U. S. L. Week 4...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that a warrantless search and seizure, if authorized...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that evidence seized pursuant to a...
A member of the Metropolitan Police of Washington, D.C. entered the hotel room of A and B for the pu...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The defendant was in the unlawful possession of narcotics. Having been given a key by his two aunts ...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search warrant based on information from an anonymou...
As a preliminary to deportation proceedings, defendant, Rudolf I. Abel, was arrested in his hotel ro...
Petitioners, suspected of carrying on an illegal lottery, had been under police observation for seve...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable to the states through the fourtee...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...
The United States Supreme Court has held that the fourth amendment does not require that a Title III...
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii has held that damages are recoverable in...