Add to ORKGThe New York Court of Appeals has held that landmark regulation of commercial property is valid provided the landowner is not deprived of all reasonable return from the designated landmark; in determining a reasonable return, the basic value is limited to that worth contributed by the owner\u27s efforts and the return must include any benefit derived from development rights made transferable by the regulation. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 42 N.Y.2d 324, 366 N.E.2d 1271, 397 N.Y.S.2d 914 (1977), aff\u27d, 98 S. Ct. 2646 (1978)
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
Through a review of recent case history, this article examines the role of courts in land use decisi...
In re City of New York (Manhattan Tower), 1 N. Y. 2d 428, 136 N. E. 2d 478 (1956)
Plaintiff was prevented by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Law from erecting a multi-story ...
The Penn Central decision, in its most immediate concern, provided a legal framework within which lo...
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, the United States Supreme Court accorded landma...
Penn Central v. New York City is the most important regulatory takings case of all time. There, the ...
Penn Central v. New York City is the most important regulatory takings case of all time. There, the ...
Journal ArticleIn Penn Central Transportation Company v. New York City, the Supreme Court held that ...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York is one...
The Interfaith Commission, religious leaders deeply concerned with the problems associated with the ...
On June 24, 2010, the New York Court of Appeals in Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp. up...
Cannata v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 210, 182 N.E.2d 395, 227 N.Y.S.2d 903 (1962)
A transferable development right or “TDR” refers to the air space above a zoning lot that can be sol...
The New York Court of Appeals recently held that the New York Real Property Law, requiring registrat...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
Through a review of recent case history, this article examines the role of courts in land use decisi...
In re City of New York (Manhattan Tower), 1 N. Y. 2d 428, 136 N. E. 2d 478 (1956)
Plaintiff was prevented by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Law from erecting a multi-story ...
The Penn Central decision, in its most immediate concern, provided a legal framework within which lo...
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, the United States Supreme Court accorded landma...
Penn Central v. New York City is the most important regulatory takings case of all time. There, the ...
Penn Central v. New York City is the most important regulatory takings case of all time. There, the ...
Journal ArticleIn Penn Central Transportation Company v. New York City, the Supreme Court held that ...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York is one...
The Interfaith Commission, religious leaders deeply concerned with the problems associated with the ...
On June 24, 2010, the New York Court of Appeals in Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp. up...
Cannata v. City of New York, 11 N.Y.2d 210, 182 N.E.2d 395, 227 N.Y.S.2d 903 (1962)
A transferable development right or “TDR” refers to the air space above a zoning lot that can be sol...
The New York Court of Appeals recently held that the New York Real Property Law, requiring registrat...
The United States Supreme Court held that land use regulations that deprive a landowner of all econo...
Through a review of recent case history, this article examines the role of courts in land use decisi...
In re City of New York (Manhattan Tower), 1 N. Y. 2d 428, 136 N. E. 2d 478 (1956)