The Interfaith Commission, religious leaders deeply concerned with the problems associated with the landmarking of religious properties, have recognized that the prohibition against demolition or alteration of landmarked religious properties effectively destroys their value. Additionally, the religious organizations are required to expend thousands of dollars of religious contributions to maintain these landmarks for the public benefit, in accordance with the regulations of the Landmarks Commission. This Comment focuses on the constitutionality of landmark preservation statutes as applied to religious properties. Using New York City as a model, this Comment examines the myriad problems presented by the landmarking of religious properties. T...
In December 2007, the District of Columbia\u27s Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB), in a unan...
The movement in the law of the Religion Clauses from Separationism, which requires distinctive treat...
Should religious landowners enjoy special protection from eminent domain? A recent federal statute, ...
On July 2, 1986, the New York Court of Appeals refused to exempt the Church of St. Paul and St. Andr...
This Article proposes to examine the conflict between religious institutions and landmark preservati...
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, the United States Supreme Court accorded landma...
The New York Court of Appeals has held that landmark regulation of commercial property is valid prov...
This brief Article defends the Supreme Court case of Pleasant Grove v. Summum (2009), which upheld a...
Along with a substantial increase in interest in historic preservation in the last decade has come a...
This paper will analyze the tension between the historic preservation of sacred places and the free ...
Thousands of religious monuments have been donated to cities and towns. Under Pleasant Grove City v....
In 1996, America almost lost a great piece of its history. The Cathedral of Saint Vibiana, located ...
In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop, 747 N.E. 2d 131 (Mass. 2001), the highest court in...
Many states have historic preservation regulations that, as applied to properties owned by religious...
Over the past 25 years, religious institutions have greatly increased their claims of violation of r...
In December 2007, the District of Columbia\u27s Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB), in a unan...
The movement in the law of the Religion Clauses from Separationism, which requires distinctive treat...
Should religious landowners enjoy special protection from eminent domain? A recent federal statute, ...
On July 2, 1986, the New York Court of Appeals refused to exempt the Church of St. Paul and St. Andr...
This Article proposes to examine the conflict between religious institutions and landmark preservati...
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, the United States Supreme Court accorded landma...
The New York Court of Appeals has held that landmark regulation of commercial property is valid prov...
This brief Article defends the Supreme Court case of Pleasant Grove v. Summum (2009), which upheld a...
Along with a substantial increase in interest in historic preservation in the last decade has come a...
This paper will analyze the tension between the historic preservation of sacred places and the free ...
Thousands of religious monuments have been donated to cities and towns. Under Pleasant Grove City v....
In 1996, America almost lost a great piece of its history. The Cathedral of Saint Vibiana, located ...
In Martin v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop, 747 N.E. 2d 131 (Mass. 2001), the highest court in...
Many states have historic preservation regulations that, as applied to properties owned by religious...
Over the past 25 years, religious institutions have greatly increased their claims of violation of r...
In December 2007, the District of Columbia\u27s Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB), in a unan...
The movement in the law of the Religion Clauses from Separationism, which requires distinctive treat...
Should religious landowners enjoy special protection from eminent domain? A recent federal statute, ...