Add to ORKGUsing the Pennyslvania [sic] legislature\u27s recent enactment of a comparative negligence statute as a vehicle, the author asserts that the courts can and should reevaluate common law concepts as they apply to cases which, although pending at the time of a legislative change in the common law, are not subject to the basically prospective statutory provisions
Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United S...
The Committee has determined to treat the resultant delay as serendipitous and to use it for the pur...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held per curiam that Pennsylvania\u27s comparative negligence...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
It is the purpose of this article to inquire, so far as possible, into the actual operation of the d...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that comparative negligence concepts should not be extended to s...
Recent decisional law by the Court of Appeals has placed new limits on the applicability of article ...
In the case of Wilfong v. Batdorf the Ohio Supreme Court reexamined the issue of the retroactive app...
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather tha...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
The issue of how to handle a victim’s own contributory negligence that combines with the negligence ...
I. Introduction II. The Comparative Negligence Statute … A. Nebraska’s Uncertain Position … B. Criti...
The law and economics literature has provided an interest group model to explain the timing of the s...
The adoption of a new principle of law invariably impinges upon related legal concepts, raising issu...
Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United S...
The Committee has determined to treat the resultant delay as serendipitous and to use it for the pur...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held per curiam that Pennsylvania\u27s comparative negligence...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
It is the purpose of this article to inquire, so far as possible, into the actual operation of the d...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that comparative negligence concepts should not be extended to s...
Recent decisional law by the Court of Appeals has placed new limits on the applicability of article ...
In the case of Wilfong v. Batdorf the Ohio Supreme Court reexamined the issue of the retroactive app...
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather tha...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
The issue of how to handle a victim’s own contributory negligence that combines with the negligence ...
I. Introduction II. The Comparative Negligence Statute … A. Nebraska’s Uncertain Position … B. Criti...
The law and economics literature has provided an interest group model to explain the timing of the s...
The adoption of a new principle of law invariably impinges upon related legal concepts, raising issu...
Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United S...
The Committee has determined to treat the resultant delay as serendipitous and to use it for the pur...
The focus of this article is the issue of integrating statutory and other law. A substantial number ...