Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United States and North Carolina. Part II describes some of the criticism levelled at the contributory negligence doctrine. Part III examines the comparative negligence doctrine, including a-description of the types of comparative negligence systems, a history of the doctrine, and a look at the history of comparative negligence bills in the North Carolina General Assembly, concentrating on the several comparative negligence bills introduced in the 1980s and one of the principal arguments made against the bills. Part IV discusses North Carolina\u27s stare decisis jurisprudence and judicial deference to the legislative branch in relation to the common ...
Part II of this thesis discusses the common law background of the assumption of risk and how it fits...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held per curiam that Pennsylvania\u27s comparative negligence...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United S...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather tha...
The purpose of this article is not to re-plow the ground of history, case law, and statutory develop...
I. Introduction II. The Comparative Negligence Statute … A. Nebraska’s Uncertain Position … B. Criti...
This note will discuss briefly the policy considerations underlying a choice between comparative neg...
It is the purpose of this article to inquire, so far as possible, into the actual operation of the d...
Almost immediately after negligence emerged as a distinct tort in the early nineteenth century, the...
The purpose of this essay is to argue that the time has now come for Virginia, by judicial or legisl...
The Article presents a comprehensive proposal for assigning liability in tort cases according to the...
The issue of how to handle a victim’s own contributory negligence that combines with the negligence ...
Part II of this thesis discusses the common law background of the assumption of risk and how it fits...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held per curiam that Pennsylvania\u27s comparative negligence...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...
Part I of this article examines the contributory negligence doctrine and its history in the United S...
The common law view of contributory negligence theoretically still obtains in most jurisdictions. Th...
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that...
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather tha...
The purpose of this article is not to re-plow the ground of history, case law, and statutory develop...
I. Introduction II. The Comparative Negligence Statute … A. Nebraska’s Uncertain Position … B. Criti...
This note will discuss briefly the policy considerations underlying a choice between comparative neg...
It is the purpose of this article to inquire, so far as possible, into the actual operation of the d...
Almost immediately after negligence emerged as a distinct tort in the early nineteenth century, the...
The purpose of this essay is to argue that the time has now come for Virginia, by judicial or legisl...
The Article presents a comprehensive proposal for assigning liability in tort cases according to the...
The issue of how to handle a victim’s own contributory negligence that combines with the negligence ...
Part II of this thesis discusses the common law background of the assumption of risk and how it fits...
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania has held per curiam that Pennsylvania\u27s comparative negligence...
The Supreme Court of Florida has unanimously held that with the adoption of comparative negligence, ...