The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the failing company doctrine cannot successfully be invoked as a defense to an anti-merger action unless defendant establishes both that the acquiring company is the only available purchaser and that there is dim or non-existent hope for reorganization of the failing company through bankruptcy procedures. Citizen Publishing Company v. United States, 89 S. Ct. 927 (1969)
The failing firm doctrine (FFD) has been firstly enounced 1921 in case International Shoe Co v FTC. ...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
For over twenty years, antitrust lawyers who defend corporate mergers have been searching for a prac...
Under the failing firm doctrine, parties to a horizontal merger or acquisition can interpose the acq...
(Excerpt) This Note proposes that the failing firm defense be strengthened to an “Assets Exiting Def...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Plaintiff, owner of 50 percent of the stock in a theater corporation, brought a derivative action in...
Under the principle of the Failing Firm Defense (FFD) a merger that would be blocked due to its har...
The failing firm defence is well-established under the US Horizontal Merger Guidelines and judicator...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
This Note proposes the abolishment of the failing company defense in merger control law. This call f...
The failing firm doctrine (FFD) has been firstly enounced 1921 in case International Shoe Co v FTC. ...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
For over twenty years, antitrust lawyers who defend corporate mergers have been searching for a prac...
Under the failing firm doctrine, parties to a horizontal merger or acquisition can interpose the acq...
(Excerpt) This Note proposes that the failing firm defense be strengthened to an “Assets Exiting Def...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Plaintiff, owner of 50 percent of the stock in a theater corporation, brought a derivative action in...
Under the principle of the Failing Firm Defense (FFD) a merger that would be blocked due to its har...
The failing firm defence is well-established under the US Horizontal Merger Guidelines and judicator...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
This Note proposes the abolishment of the failing company defense in merger control law. This call f...
The failing firm doctrine (FFD) has been firstly enounced 1921 in case International Shoe Co v FTC. ...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
A and B owned 50 per cent of the stock in each of two solvent corporations, and Y and Z owned the re...