Add to ORKGThis article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies special treatment under the antitrust laws. Part I discusses the acquisition of a failing company, which may constitute a judicially-created exemption from section 7 of the Clayton Act. Part II considers certain cases involving failing companies whose conduct is challenged under section 1 of the Sherman Act
We explore in this Article the basis and consequences of the target\u27s suit under the antitrust la...
The United States Supreme Court has held that in order to seek injunctive relief under the Clayton A...
In one sentence § 2 of the Sherman Act condemns firms who “monopolize,” “attempt to monopolize” or “...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
Under the failing firm doctrine, parties to a horizontal merger or acquisition can interpose the acq...
This comment will approach section 7 relief questions and solutions primarily in the light of du Pon...
Entry into and competition within professions and many industries is commonly restricted by private ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the failing company doctrine cannot successfull...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
Section 7 of the Sherman Act, as amended by section 4 of the Clayton Act, gives a private right of a...
This Article examines the feasibility and desirability of marshalling section 2(c)\u27 of the Clayto...
In the many years since the passage of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act its substantive provisions have go...
This paper examines how current antitrust law can be better interpreted to address Facebook’s allege...
We explore in this Article the basis and consequences of the target\u27s suit under the antitrust la...
The United States Supreme Court has held that in order to seek injunctive relief under the Clayton A...
In one sentence § 2 of the Sherman Act condemns firms who “monopolize,” “attempt to monopolize” or “...
This article will examine two areas in which the courts have given financially-troubled companies sp...
Even though application of section 7 has become increasingly effective, a specific exception to its ...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
Under the failing firm doctrine, parties to a horizontal merger or acquisition can interpose the acq...
This comment will approach section 7 relief questions and solutions primarily in the light of du Pon...
Entry into and competition within professions and many industries is commonly restricted by private ...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the failing company doctrine cannot successfull...
Antitrust--Monopolies--Merger of Firm with a Potential Competitor that May Enter the Market by Toe--...
Section 7 of the Sherman Act, as amended by section 4 of the Clayton Act, gives a private right of a...
This Article examines the feasibility and desirability of marshalling section 2(c)\u27 of the Clayto...
In the many years since the passage of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act its substantive provisions have go...
This paper examines how current antitrust law can be better interpreted to address Facebook’s allege...
We explore in this Article the basis and consequences of the target\u27s suit under the antitrust la...
The United States Supreme Court has held that in order to seek injunctive relief under the Clayton A...
In one sentence § 2 of the Sherman Act condemns firms who “monopolize,” “attempt to monopolize” or “...