A person suffering from a mental illness has no constitutional right to liberty as long as the mental illness exists. The state exercises control over the locomotion of such individuals to prevent injury either to the patient himself or to other citizens and property. Power to protect the patient flows from the general duty of the sovereign to care for the members of society, i.e., the parens patriae doctrine. Similarly, the state police power includes the power to safeguard citizens and their property
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
The states have traditionally exercised broad power to commit the mentally ill. Civil commitment of ...
By enacting the Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, Pennsylvania responded to judicial recognition...
Plaintiff Kenneth Donaldson, a former state mental patient, brought an action for damages under 42 U...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has held Pennsylvania\u27s ...
The Supreme Court has recognized that civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of libe...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
THE RESPONDENT, Kenneth Donaldson, was involuntarily civilly committed! as a mental patient\u27 in t...
Pennsylvania courts inconsistently interpret the Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act, which go...
The purpose of this paper is to present and describe a unique legislative prescription, an untried a...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal and Pennsylvania stat...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
The states have traditionally exercised broad power to commit the mentally ill. Civil commitment of ...
By enacting the Mental Health Procedures Act of 1976, Pennsylvania responded to judicial recognition...
Plaintiff Kenneth Donaldson, a former state mental patient, brought an action for damages under 42 U...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has held Pennsylvania\u27s ...
The Supreme Court has recognized that civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of libe...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
THE RESPONDENT, Kenneth Donaldson, was involuntarily civilly committed! as a mental patient\u27 in t...
Pennsylvania courts inconsistently interpret the Pennsylvania Mental Health Procedures Act, which go...
The purpose of this paper is to present and describe a unique legislative prescription, an untried a...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that federal and Pennsylvania stat...
Mental illness is principally a medical problem, but there are basic legal considerations to be obse...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...