The states have traditionally exercised broad power to commit the mentally ill. Civil commitment of such persons has generally been justified under two premises. First is the concept of parenspatriaewhich justifies the involuntary commitment of the mentally ill for their care and treatment or protection from harm. Second is the state\u27s police power under which it may safeguard the public health, safety, welfare and morals. The substantive and procedural limitations upon this power may vary drastically from state to state. Despite the activity of the states in this area, no constitutional mandate exists requiring a state to provide for the mentally ill
The involuntary confinement of the mentally ill creates disquieting tensions for a society which i...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
The recently established constitutional right to an independent psychiatric examination for a crimin...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The Supreme Court has recognized that civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of libe...
A person suffering from a mental illness has no constitutional right to liberty as long as the menta...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
Plaintiff Kenneth Donaldson, a former state mental patient, brought an action for damages under 42 U...
Traditionally, the power of the state has included the power to commit mentally ill citizens to psyc...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
Almost every American state allows civil commitment upon a finding that a person, as a result of men...
Almost every American state allows civil commitment upon a finding that a person, as a result of men...
The time is almost within the memory of living persons when it was deemed not only lawful but proper...
Each year more of our fellow citizens are involuntarily committed to a mental institution of one sor...
The involuntary confinement of the mentally ill creates disquieting tensions for a society which i...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
The recently established constitutional right to an independent psychiatric examination for a crimin...
Nebraska\u27s procedures for the civil commitment of the mentally ill are lacking in protections for...
The Supreme Court has recognized that civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of libe...
A person suffering from a mental illness has no constitutional right to liberty as long as the menta...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an involuntarily committed mental patient has constitu...
Plaintiff Kenneth Donaldson, a former state mental patient, brought an action for damages under 42 U...
Traditionally, the power of the state has included the power to commit mentally ill citizens to psyc...
The passage of the District of Columbia Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill Act in 1965 and more rec...
The rights revolution, sparked by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of former C...
Almost every American state allows civil commitment upon a finding that a person, as a result of men...
Almost every American state allows civil commitment upon a finding that a person, as a result of men...
The time is almost within the memory of living persons when it was deemed not only lawful but proper...
Each year more of our fellow citizens are involuntarily committed to a mental institution of one sor...
The involuntary confinement of the mentally ill creates disquieting tensions for a society which i...
A number of recent events makes it timely to reconsider certain aspects of the relation between psyc...
The recently established constitutional right to an independent psychiatric examination for a crimin...