Add to ORKGThis research concerns corporations’ responsibility to improve victims’ access to an effective remedy by engaging [in] various non-judicial grievance mechanisms, and focuses primarily on the ‘legitimacy’, and ‘rights compatible’ criteria envisaged under Principle 31 of the UNGPs. I demonstrate that non-binding non-judicial mechanisms exhibit significant weaknesses in the area of the above criteria, and therefore show why (and how) it is vital that Unilaterally binding arbitration should occupy a greater role in the resolution of business-related human rights violation
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the most recent public policy and ethical iss...
Although the scholarly literature is replete with discussion of the pros and cons of mandatory arbit...
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...
This research concerns corporations’ responsibility to improve victims’ access to an effective remed...
As transnational corporations have emerged as some of the most prominent actors within the internati...
International law demands that States provide victims of human rights violations with a right to rem...
The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration, initiated by the Business and Human Rights...
The question of redress for corporate human rights violations remains daunting. Access to justice ch...
Corporate liability for human rights abuses is one of the most important developments in current int...
In the absence of effective judicial remediation mechanisms after business-related human rights viol...
The research proposes a new way to fix the current weak link of international human rights legal sys...
This article presents an empirical study of six grievance mechanisms in multi-stakeholder initiative...
The capacity to abuse, or in general affect the enjoyment of human, labour and environmental rights ...
Arbitration is generally viewed as a form of dispute resolution more or less removed from the contro...
This Article takes a human rights law perspective on the issue of enforcing corporate social respons...
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the most recent public policy and ethical iss...
Although the scholarly literature is replete with discussion of the pros and cons of mandatory arbit...
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...
This research concerns corporations’ responsibility to improve victims’ access to an effective remed...
As transnational corporations have emerged as some of the most prominent actors within the internati...
International law demands that States provide victims of human rights violations with a right to rem...
The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration, initiated by the Business and Human Rights...
The question of redress for corporate human rights violations remains daunting. Access to justice ch...
Corporate liability for human rights abuses is one of the most important developments in current int...
In the absence of effective judicial remediation mechanisms after business-related human rights viol...
The research proposes a new way to fix the current weak link of international human rights legal sys...
This article presents an empirical study of six grievance mechanisms in multi-stakeholder initiative...
The capacity to abuse, or in general affect the enjoyment of human, labour and environmental rights ...
Arbitration is generally viewed as a form of dispute resolution more or less removed from the contro...
This Article takes a human rights law perspective on the issue of enforcing corporate social respons...
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the most recent public policy and ethical iss...
Although the scholarly literature is replete with discussion of the pros and cons of mandatory arbit...
International human rights law is generally thought to apply directly to states, not to corporations...