There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent com- munication languages, based either on mental attitudes or on social commitments. In this paper, we translate both traditions in a different approach in which the di- alogue state is represented by the beliefs and goals publicly attributed to the roles played by the dialogue participants. On the one hand, this approach avoids the problems of mentalistic semantics, such as the unverifiability of private mental states. On the other hand, it allows use to reuse the logics and implementations developed for FIPA compliant approaches
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
AbstractThe current ACL proposals show some shortcomings with respect to the definition of their sem...
There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent com- munication languages, based eit...
Abstract. There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages, b...
There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages, based eithe...
peer reviewedThere are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages...
peer reviewedThere are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages...
International audienceIn complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly d...
We consider agents having multiple communication ses-sions at the same time. We assume that FIPA sem...
We consider agents having multiple communication sessions at the same time. We assume that FIPA sema...
Abstract. In complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly designed by d...
International audienceIn complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly d...
AbstractThe current ACL proposals show some shortcomings with respect to the definition of their sem...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
AbstractThe current ACL proposals show some shortcomings with respect to the definition of their sem...
There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent com- munication languages, based eit...
Abstract. There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages, b...
There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages, based eithe...
peer reviewedThere are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages...
peer reviewedThere are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages...
International audienceIn complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly d...
We consider agents having multiple communication ses-sions at the same time. We assume that FIPA sem...
We consider agents having multiple communication sessions at the same time. We assume that FIPA sema...
Abstract. In complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly designed by d...
International audienceIn complex multi agent systems, the agents may be heterogeneous and possibly d...
AbstractThe current ACL proposals show some shortcomings with respect to the definition of their sem...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
Les rapports de recherche du LIG - ISSN: 2105-0422Most agent Communication Languages are no longer d...
AbstractThe current ACL proposals show some shortcomings with respect to the definition of their sem...