The Australian High Court\u27s ruling in May 2006 on Work Choices legislation has significantly expanded the Commonwealth\u27s legislative power at the expense of the States, but for the time being it has also muddied the responsibilities between Commonwealth and States more then ever. Work Choices: What the High Court Said by Written by George Williams and Andrew Stewart, is a new book that describes and analyses the case in detail. Here Andrew Stewart describes how the decision\u27s implications extend far beyond labour regulation
The Howard Government’s industrial relations reforms represent a significant step towards a uniform ...
This paper sets out the history of the philosophical understanding held by the major political parti...
In a previous paper, the authors (Stewart & Horneman-Wren 2006) argued that the enactment of the Wor...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
The federal government’s Work Choices laws could affect many thousands more workers in educati...
The Work Choices legislation represents a concerted attempt to tilt the balance of labour regulation...
Abstract: In late 2005, the Australian Parliament enacted the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Ch...
Business and government may have got more than they expected in the High Court\u27s decision on Work...
The complete overhaul of Australian labour laws by the federal government's Work Choices revisions c...
Never has a form of legislation created such contentious and wide-reaching emotional debate in Austr...
The last two decades have seen almost constant change in Australian labour law. Since the Hawke Gove...
The introduction of the Workplace Relations (Work Choices) Amendment Act 2005 (Cth) has resulted in ...
This special issue of the Economic and Labour Relations Review is devoted to an examination of the W...
In this concluding chapter, we discuss some of the main themes that emerge from the studies of the W...
"The authors, leading scholars and practitioners, examine both the nature and legacy of the controve...
The Howard Government’s industrial relations reforms represent a significant step towards a uniform ...
This paper sets out the history of the philosophical understanding held by the major political parti...
In a previous paper, the authors (Stewart & Horneman-Wren 2006) argued that the enactment of the Wor...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
The federal government’s Work Choices laws could affect many thousands more workers in educati...
The Work Choices legislation represents a concerted attempt to tilt the balance of labour regulation...
Abstract: In late 2005, the Australian Parliament enacted the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Ch...
Business and government may have got more than they expected in the High Court\u27s decision on Work...
The complete overhaul of Australian labour laws by the federal government's Work Choices revisions c...
Never has a form of legislation created such contentious and wide-reaching emotional debate in Austr...
The last two decades have seen almost constant change in Australian labour law. Since the Hawke Gove...
The introduction of the Workplace Relations (Work Choices) Amendment Act 2005 (Cth) has resulted in ...
This special issue of the Economic and Labour Relations Review is devoted to an examination of the W...
In this concluding chapter, we discuss some of the main themes that emerge from the studies of the W...
"The authors, leading scholars and practitioners, examine both the nature and legacy of the controve...
The Howard Government’s industrial relations reforms represent a significant step towards a uniform ...
This paper sets out the history of the philosophical understanding held by the major political parti...
In a previous paper, the authors (Stewart & Horneman-Wren 2006) argued that the enactment of the Wor...