In Lee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., the Georgia Supreme Court created a partial exception to Georgia\u27s impact rule. The court held that when a parent and child sustain a direct physical impact and physical injuries through the negligence of another, and the child dies as a result of such negligence, the parent may attempt to recover for serious emotional distress from witnessing the child\u27s suffering and death regardless of whether the emotional distress arises from the physical injury to the parent
In situations where a child has been killed or injured as the result of a third party\u27s negligent...
In Washington, an action may be brought by a parent for the wrongful death of a child along either o...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
In Strickland v. Hodges, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that there is no independent right of act...
The parents of Bonnie Garland are only two of the innumerable third-party victims who have suffered ...
The Nebraska Supreme Court in Selders v. Armentrout overturned approximately forty years of decision...
The impact rule is an ancient torts doctrine that precludes recovery for emotional distress unless t...
This Note will examine the rationale of the Johnson decision and illustrate how a parent\u27s claim ...
The Act amends the Code provision relating to the right of parents to recover in tort for the homici...
This Act designates who controls wrongful death recoveries intended to benefit a surviving child. Fo...
The early decisions involving negligently inflicted emotional distress and resulting physical injuri...
Granting a child\u27s loss of consortium claim for a negligently injured parent is a relatively youn...
Torts-IMPACT RULE-DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE FOR PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS REGARDLESS...
The term consortium has been defined as [t]he benefits that one person . . . is entitled to recei...
In property insurance cases, there were two Georgia Supreme Court decisions with the potential for s...
In situations where a child has been killed or injured as the result of a third party\u27s negligent...
In Washington, an action may be brought by a parent for the wrongful death of a child along either o...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...
In Strickland v. Hodges, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that there is no independent right of act...
The parents of Bonnie Garland are only two of the innumerable third-party victims who have suffered ...
The Nebraska Supreme Court in Selders v. Armentrout overturned approximately forty years of decision...
The impact rule is an ancient torts doctrine that precludes recovery for emotional distress unless t...
This Note will examine the rationale of the Johnson decision and illustrate how a parent\u27s claim ...
The Act amends the Code provision relating to the right of parents to recover in tort for the homici...
This Act designates who controls wrongful death recoveries intended to benefit a surviving child. Fo...
The early decisions involving negligently inflicted emotional distress and resulting physical injuri...
Granting a child\u27s loss of consortium claim for a negligently injured parent is a relatively youn...
Torts-IMPACT RULE-DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE FOR PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS REGARDLESS...
The term consortium has been defined as [t]he benefits that one person . . . is entitled to recei...
In property insurance cases, there were two Georgia Supreme Court decisions with the potential for s...
In situations where a child has been killed or injured as the result of a third party\u27s negligent...
In Washington, an action may be brought by a parent for the wrongful death of a child along either o...
The rule in all states that have heard such actions is that an unemancipated child cannot sue his pa...