Add to ORKGTorts-IMPACT RULE-DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE FOR PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER INJURED PARTY SUFFERED PHYSICAL IMPACT IN THE COMMISSION OF THE TORT
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that a woman can recover damages from her divorced husban...
As a general rule, contracts law does not permit an award of general damages for mental distress or ...
Appellee brought an action in tort to recover damages for mental anguish suffered when appellant had...
Torts-IMPACT RULE-DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE FOR PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS REGARDLESS...
The early decisions involving negligently inflicted emotional distress and resulting physical injuri...
The impact rule is an ancient torts doctrine that precludes recovery for emotional distress unless t...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
Emotional distress is a mental injury that includes pain such as anxiety or deep grief. Traditionall...
In Bass v. Nooney Co., the Supreme Court of Missouri abandoned the rule that a defendant is not liab...
Recovery for the negligent infliction of emotional distress has always been a hazy and constantly ch...
In Lee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., the Georgia Supreme Court created a partial exception to ...
In Strickland v. Hodges, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that there is no independent right of act...
Until recently, a plaintiff who had suffered emotional injury normally had to show an accompanying p...
Tort Law-NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS-SHOULD THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REPLACE THE IMP...
In Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. Flint, the Supreme Court laid down the general proposition that...
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that a woman can recover damages from her divorced husban...
As a general rule, contracts law does not permit an award of general damages for mental distress or ...
Appellee brought an action in tort to recover damages for mental anguish suffered when appellant had...
Torts-IMPACT RULE-DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE FOR PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS REGARDLESS...
The early decisions involving negligently inflicted emotional distress and resulting physical injuri...
The impact rule is an ancient torts doctrine that precludes recovery for emotional distress unless t...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that plaintiff could recover for physical injuries resulting...
Emotional distress is a mental injury that includes pain such as anxiety or deep grief. Traditionall...
In Bass v. Nooney Co., the Supreme Court of Missouri abandoned the rule that a defendant is not liab...
Recovery for the negligent infliction of emotional distress has always been a hazy and constantly ch...
In Lee v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., the Georgia Supreme Court created a partial exception to ...
In Strickland v. Hodges, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that there is no independent right of act...
Until recently, a plaintiff who had suffered emotional injury normally had to show an accompanying p...
Tort Law-NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS-SHOULD THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT REPLACE THE IMP...
In Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. Flint, the Supreme Court laid down the general proposition that...
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that a woman can recover damages from her divorced husban...
As a general rule, contracts law does not permit an award of general damages for mental distress or ...
Appellee brought an action in tort to recover damages for mental anguish suffered when appellant had...