Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). There are few published data regarding maternal and perinatal risks comparing MCCS with planned vaginal birth (VB) in uncomplicated first pregnancies to inform choice. We report the results of a pragmatic patient-preference cohort study of private patients in Australia: 64 women planning MCCS and 113 women planning VB. There were few differences in outcome between the two groups. The study highlighted the well-recognised difficulties in undertaking prospective research into MCCS
Medicine is changing, especially in obstetrics. We now have to involve patients in decision making. ...
As the rate of primary and repeat Caesareans around the world increases, obstetricians, midwives and...
Objectives The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known abo...
Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). ...
Objective To explore whether women view decision-making surrounding vaginal or caesarean birth as t...
Objective To explore whether women view decision-making surrounding vaginal or caesarean birth as t...
A study conducted in Australia provides new data on the outcomes for mother and baby associated with...
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists about benefits and harms of a planned vaginal birth after caesarean (...
Background: \ud Uncertainty exists about benefits and harms of a planned vaginal birth after caesare...
BackgroundCaesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are c...
The purpose of this paper is to explore, from the mothers' perspective, the decision-making experien...
BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are...
Background: \ud Women who birth in private facilities in Australia are more likely to have a caesare...
© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Objective: To determine personal birth preferences...
Actively engaging women in decision-making about their own care is critical to providing woman-cente...
Medicine is changing, especially in obstetrics. We now have to involve patients in decision making. ...
As the rate of primary and repeat Caesareans around the world increases, obstetricians, midwives and...
Objectives The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known abo...
Rising rates of caesarean section (CS) have been attributed, in part, to maternal-choice CS (MCCS). ...
Objective To explore whether women view decision-making surrounding vaginal or caesarean birth as t...
Objective To explore whether women view decision-making surrounding vaginal or caesarean birth as t...
A study conducted in Australia provides new data on the outcomes for mother and baby associated with...
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists about benefits and harms of a planned vaginal birth after caesarean (...
Background: \ud Uncertainty exists about benefits and harms of a planned vaginal birth after caesare...
BackgroundCaesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are c...
The purpose of this paper is to explore, from the mothers' perspective, the decision-making experien...
BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are...
Background: \ud Women who birth in private facilities in Australia are more likely to have a caesare...
© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Objective: To determine personal birth preferences...
Actively engaging women in decision-making about their own care is critical to providing woman-cente...
Medicine is changing, especially in obstetrics. We now have to involve patients in decision making. ...
As the rate of primary and repeat Caesareans around the world increases, obstetricians, midwives and...
Objectives The caesarean (CS) section rate varies among hospitals in Norway, and little is known abo...