In embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are sometimes of critical importance for the operational safety. These high criticality systems require strict compliance with the offline predicted task execution time. The execution of a task when subject to preemption may vary significantly in comparison to its non-preemptive execution. Hence, when preemptive scheduling is required to operate the workload, preemption delay estimation is of paramount importance. In this paper a preemption delay estimation method for floating non-preemptive scheduling policies is presented. This work builds on [1], extending the model and optimising it considerably. The preemption delay function is subject to a major tightness improv...
We consider the problem of scheduling hard real-time tasks subjected to preemption delays on a unipr...
With the rapid growth of complex hardware features, timing analysis has become an increasingly diffi...
It is well known that on-line preemptive scheduling algorithms can achieve efficient performance, A ...
In embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are sometimes of critical import...
Abstract—In embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are sometimes of critic...
International audienceIn embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are someti...
In real-time systems, there are two distinct trends for scheduling task sets on unicore systems: non...
To appear in Design and Automation Conference 2012 (DATE 2012)In real-time systems, there are two di...
Preemptions account for a non-negligible overhead during system execution. There has been substantia...
During the past decades of research in Real-Time systems, non-preemptive scheduling and fully preemp...
Preemptive scheduling often generates a significant runtime overhead that may increase task worst-ca...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems under preemptive scheduling may often lead to false-neg...
Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling paradigms typically introduce undesirable side effects when...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems requires the knowledge of the worst-case execution time...
We consider the problem of scheduling hard real-time tasks subjected to preemption delays on a unipr...
With the rapid growth of complex hardware features, timing analysis has become an increasingly diffi...
It is well known that on-line preemptive scheduling algorithms can achieve efficient performance, A ...
In embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are sometimes of critical import...
Abstract—In embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are sometimes of critic...
International audienceIn embedded systems, the timing behaviour of the control mechanisms are someti...
In real-time systems, there are two distinct trends for scheduling task sets on unicore systems: non...
To appear in Design and Automation Conference 2012 (DATE 2012)In real-time systems, there are two di...
Preemptions account for a non-negligible overhead during system execution. There has been substantia...
During the past decades of research in Real-Time systems, non-preemptive scheduling and fully preemp...
Preemptive scheduling often generates a significant runtime overhead that may increase task worst-ca...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems under preemptive scheduling may often lead to false-neg...
Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling paradigms typically introduce undesirable side effects when...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems requires the knowledge of the worst-case execution time...
We consider the problem of scheduling hard real-time tasks subjected to preemption delays on a unipr...
With the rapid growth of complex hardware features, timing analysis has become an increasingly diffi...
It is well known that on-line preemptive scheduling algorithms can achieve efficient performance, A ...