During the past decades of research in Real-Time systems, non-preemptive scheduling and fully preemptive scheduling have been extensively investigated, as well as compared with each other. However, it has been shown that none of the two scheduling paradigms dominates over the other in terms of schedulability. In this context, Limited Preemptive Scheduling (LPS) has emerged as an attractive alternative with respect to, e.g., increasing the overall system schedu- lability, efficiently reducing the blocking by lower priority tasks (compared to non-preemptive scheduling) as well as efficiently controlling the number of preemptions, thus controlling the overall preemption-related delay (compared to fully-preemptive scheduling). Several approache...
Preemptive scheduling often generates a significant runtime overhead that may increase task worst-ca...
Compared to fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS), fixedpriority scheduling with preemption th...
In real-time systems, there are two distinct trends for scheduling task sets on unicore systems: non...
During the past decades of research in Real-Time systems, non-preemptive scheduling and fully preemp...
Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling paradigms typically introduce undesirable side effects when...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems under preemptive scheduling may often lead to false-neg...
Limited Preemptive Fixed Preemption Point scheduling (LP-FPP) has the ability to decrease and contro...
Preemptive schedulers have been widely adopted in single processor real-time systems to avoid the bl...
Fixed-priority scheduling with deferred preemption(FPDS) and fixed-priority scheduling with preempti...
The question whether preemptive algorithms are better than nonpreemptive ones for scheduling a set o...
28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2016). 5 to 8, Jul, 2016. Toulouse, France.Thi...
The optimality of the Earliest Deadline First scheduler for uniprocessor systems is one of the main ...
This paper aims at advancing the relative strength of limited-preemptive schedulers by improving the...
Preemptive scheduling often generates a significant runtime overhead that may increase task worst-ca...
Compared to fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS), fixedpriority scheduling with preemption th...
In real-time systems, there are two distinct trends for scheduling task sets on unicore systems: non...
During the past decades of research in Real-Time systems, non-preemptive scheduling and fully preemp...
Preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling paradigms typically introduce undesirable side effects when...
Schedulability analysis of real-time systems under preemptive scheduling may often lead to false-neg...
Limited Preemptive Fixed Preemption Point scheduling (LP-FPP) has the ability to decrease and contro...
Preemptive schedulers have been widely adopted in single processor real-time systems to avoid the bl...
Fixed-priority scheduling with deferred preemption(FPDS) and fixed-priority scheduling with preempti...
The question whether preemptive algorithms are better than nonpreemptive ones for scheduling a set o...
28th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (ECRTS 2016). 5 to 8, Jul, 2016. Toulouse, France.Thi...
The optimality of the Earliest Deadline First scheduler for uniprocessor systems is one of the main ...
This paper aims at advancing the relative strength of limited-preemptive schedulers by improving the...
Preemptive scheduling often generates a significant runtime overhead that may increase task worst-ca...
Compared to fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS), fixedpriority scheduling with preemption th...
In real-time systems, there are two distinct trends for scheduling task sets on unicore systems: non...