In saussurian linguistics as in guillaumian psychomechanics, the activity of language (or the circuit if the speech) has benn apprehended as the ego(I) centric pair of I-You, taking the visible concrete(=I as real/lexical interrogative entity) for the invisible abstract(=You as interrogative grammatical marker), and vice-versa, with this difference that it presupposes or not the notion of kinetism. This same egocentric apprehension of the circuit has led to the error of treating two types of grammatical marker(pre-postposed to the lexical in French and in Korean), such as the gender-honorofic relating to the man-things and the intrasentential preposition-particle of case, under the separate label and in this implicit order. In order to surp...