Linguistische Ubersetzungstheorie und Textlinguistik

In saussurian linguistics as in guillaumian psychomechanics, the activity of language (or the circuit if the speech) has benn apprehended as the ego(I} centric pair of I-You, taking the visible concretet=(I as real/lexical interrogative entity) for the invisible abstract(=You as interrogative grammatical marker), and vice-versa, with this difference that it presupposes or not the notion of kinetism. This same egocentric apprehension of the circuit has led to the error of treating two types of grammatical marker(pre-postposed to the lexical in French and in Korean), such as the gender-honorojic relating to the man-things and the intrasentential preposition-particle of case, under the separate label and in this implicit order. In order to surpass the limits of this lexico-grammatical(=incidencial/combinatory) treatment, it is necessary to reconstitute the kinetico-synaptic(You-centric) non arbitrary mechanism of the person, namely, to reduce the pair of the non synaptic(timeless/I-centric) circuit to two distinct synaptic times: the before(pure question-response: zero honorific) and the after (Q. -R. : Honorofic), that is, to apprehend the general synaptic mechanism(You →/←I), which is equivalent to the following formula: "genesis ~ (synaptifying)/synaptifee", or "flexional person → (verbal person)/ pronominal person", or else "theory(general phonology) ↔ general morphology ↔ internal syntax ↔ external syntax"