This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate that they are I(1), Johansen likelihood ratio (LR) tests tend to find too much spurious cointegration, while the Engle-Granger test presents a more robust performance. This result holds asymptotically as well as infinite samples. The different performance of these two methods is due to the fact that they are based on different principles. The Johansen procedure is based on maximizing correlations (canonical correlation) while Engle-Granger minimizes variances (in the spirit of principal components).Publicad
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
Engle-Granger methodology follows two-step estimations. The first step generates the residuals and t...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
Engle-Granger methodology follows two-step estimations. The first step generates the residuals and t...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows that when series are fractionally integrated, but unit root tests wrongly indicate ...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper shows, analytically and numerically, the effects of a misspecification in the degree of i...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
This paper analyzes the robustness of the two most commonly used cointegration tests: the single equ...
Engle-Granger methodology follows two-step estimations. The first step generates the residuals and t...