Add to ORKGVTT MIKES arranged a balance calibration comparison for Finnish laboratories accredited for balance calibration. The calibrated balances were 600 g ja 10 kg balances. Four accredited laboratories and seven persons carrying out the measurements participated in the comparison. All the results were in agreement with the reference value of the comparison. The largest normalized error En was 0.64.</p
A regular assessment is fundamental to ensure that a balance provides reliable and accurate weighing...
The quantitative assessment of balance still needs to be performed in a laboratory equipped with for...
This report describes a key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards, CCM.M-K4, undertaken ...
A comparison M4 of a 5 kg balance was carried out in June 2003 by the Centre for Metrology and Accre...
A comparison of a 300 g laboratory balance (d = 0,1 mg) was carried out in December 2010 at the Cent...
A group of nine calibration laboratories performed an intercomparison of Conventional Mass in 2004. ...
A 50 kg mass comparison between five national laboratories (Metrosert, MIKES, EIM,LNMC, JV) was carr...
Mittatekniikan keskus (MIKES) ja kolme FINASin akkreditoimaa massan kalibrointilaboratoriota osallis...
Interlaboratory comparisons are crucial part of laboratory quality system. The goal of this project ...
It has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argent...
In order to demonstrate the equivalence in calibration of 500 kg mass standard among National Metrol...
Mass comparison of conventional masses of 500 kg and 1000 kg weights between three laboratories (Met...
Mass measurement of more than 500 kg on an electronic mass comparator has no better repeatability an...
In the introductory chapter of this work is caught organizational structure of the national metrolog...
The paper presents interlaboratory comparison of Latvian mass measurement laboratories using a set o...
A regular assessment is fundamental to ensure that a balance provides reliable and accurate weighing...
The quantitative assessment of balance still needs to be performed in a laboratory equipped with for...
This report describes a key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards, CCM.M-K4, undertaken ...
A comparison M4 of a 5 kg balance was carried out in June 2003 by the Centre for Metrology and Accre...
A comparison of a 300 g laboratory balance (d = 0,1 mg) was carried out in December 2010 at the Cent...
A group of nine calibration laboratories performed an intercomparison of Conventional Mass in 2004. ...
A 50 kg mass comparison between five national laboratories (Metrosert, MIKES, EIM,LNMC, JV) was carr...
Mittatekniikan keskus (MIKES) ja kolme FINASin akkreditoimaa massan kalibrointilaboratoriota osallis...
Interlaboratory comparisons are crucial part of laboratory quality system. The goal of this project ...
It has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argent...
In order to demonstrate the equivalence in calibration of 500 kg mass standard among National Metrol...
Mass comparison of conventional masses of 500 kg and 1000 kg weights between three laboratories (Met...
Mass measurement of more than 500 kg on an electronic mass comparator has no better repeatability an...
In the introductory chapter of this work is caught organizational structure of the national metrolog...
The paper presents interlaboratory comparison of Latvian mass measurement laboratories using a set o...
A regular assessment is fundamental to ensure that a balance provides reliable and accurate weighing...
The quantitative assessment of balance still needs to be performed in a laboratory equipped with for...
This report describes a key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards, CCM.M-K4, undertaken ...