A comparison M4 of a 5 kg balance was carried out in June 2003 by the Centre for Metrology and Accreditation (MIKES). Six participants from four accredited calibration laboratories from Finland participated in the comparison. The reference laboratory was MIKES. The comparison was made with a high resolution (d = 1 mg) laboratory balance. The measurements were made at MIKES. The participants calibrated the balance according to their own measurement procedures using their own weights. Measurement results of the laboratories were taken from calibration certificates. All results were in agreement with the results of MIKES
Mass measurement of more than 500 kg on an electronic mass comparator has no better repeatability an...
The paper presents interlaboratory comparison of Latvian mass measurement laboratories using a set o...
The masses of weights (1 mg, 10 mg, 500 mg, 1 g, 50 g and 100 g) and volumes of weights (1 g, 50 g a...
A comparison M4 of a 5 kg balance was carried out in June 2003 by the Centre for Metrology and Accre...
A comparison of a 300 g laboratory balance (d = 0,1 mg) was carried out in December 2010 at the Cent...
VTT MIKES arranged a balance calibration comparison for Finnish laboratories accredited for balance ...
A group of nine calibration laboratories performed an intercomparison of Conventional Mass in 2004. ...
Mass comparison of conventional masses of 500 kg and 1000 kg weights between three laboratories (Met...
A 50 kg mass comparison between five national laboratories (Metrosert, MIKES, EIM,LNMC, JV) was carr...
Interlaboratory comparisons are crucial part of laboratory quality system. The goal of this project ...
In order to demonstrate the equivalence in calibration of 500 kg mass standard among National Metrol...
Mittatekniikan keskus (MIKES) ja kolme FINASin akkreditoimaa massan kalibrointilaboratoriota osallis...
This report describes a key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards, CCM.M-K4, undertaken ...
In order to show equivalence in mass standards calibration among National Metrology Institutes of me...
In order to show equivalence in mass standards calibration among National Metrology Institutes (NMIs...
Mass measurement of more than 500 kg on an electronic mass comparator has no better repeatability an...
The paper presents interlaboratory comparison of Latvian mass measurement laboratories using a set o...
The masses of weights (1 mg, 10 mg, 500 mg, 1 g, 50 g and 100 g) and volumes of weights (1 g, 50 g a...
A comparison M4 of a 5 kg balance was carried out in June 2003 by the Centre for Metrology and Accre...
A comparison of a 300 g laboratory balance (d = 0,1 mg) was carried out in December 2010 at the Cent...
VTT MIKES arranged a balance calibration comparison for Finnish laboratories accredited for balance ...
A group of nine calibration laboratories performed an intercomparison of Conventional Mass in 2004. ...
Mass comparison of conventional masses of 500 kg and 1000 kg weights between three laboratories (Met...
A 50 kg mass comparison between five national laboratories (Metrosert, MIKES, EIM,LNMC, JV) was carr...
Interlaboratory comparisons are crucial part of laboratory quality system. The goal of this project ...
In order to demonstrate the equivalence in calibration of 500 kg mass standard among National Metrol...
Mittatekniikan keskus (MIKES) ja kolme FINASin akkreditoimaa massan kalibrointilaboratoriota osallis...
This report describes a key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards, CCM.M-K4, undertaken ...
In order to show equivalence in mass standards calibration among National Metrology Institutes of me...
In order to show equivalence in mass standards calibration among National Metrology Institutes (NMIs...
Mass measurement of more than 500 kg on an electronic mass comparator has no better repeatability an...
The paper presents interlaboratory comparison of Latvian mass measurement laboratories using a set o...
The masses of weights (1 mg, 10 mg, 500 mg, 1 g, 50 g and 100 g) and volumes of weights (1 g, 50 g a...