This paper presents the results of a search for statistical relationships between authorship in terms of the number of authors, number of significant terms/words in article titles, number of references cited, and citation impact of a set of 467 articles published in the international journal Scientometrics from 1999 to 2003. Our analysis shows that, controlling for the growth dynamics of citations, the mean citation impact of articles depends strongly on the authorship as measured by the number of authors per article. A chi-square test indicated that the number of references cited in articles and their citation impact are not independent. There is a fairly high degree of linear association between the number of times an article is cited and...
This paper analyses growth pattern, core journals and authors' distribution in the field of bibliome...
The citations count is flawed but it still the most common way of measuring the academic impact used...
Standard approaches to measurement of the ‘impact’ of academic journals, or even sometimes of indivi...
Citations to published scientific articles are regularly collected and processed, bringing about the...
We investigate how textual properties of scientific papers relate to the number of citations they re...
Citations remain a prime, yet controversial, measure of academic performance. Ideally, how often a p...
How do the level of usage of an article, the timeframe of its usage and its subject area relate to t...
The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to exa...
The relevance of citations is clear since they constitute a substantial part of most bibliometric in...
We investigate how textual properties of scientific papers relate to the number of citations they re...
In spite of previous research demonstrating the risks involved, and counsel against the practice as ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Scientometrics on 09/05/2016, ...
Scientometrics is one of the leading peer-reviewed journals in the field of Library and Information ...
Objective – The researchers investigated whether faculty use of the references in articles had a rel...
The number of citations a paper receives is the most commonly used measure of scientific impact. In ...
This paper analyses growth pattern, core journals and authors' distribution in the field of bibliome...
The citations count is flawed but it still the most common way of measuring the academic impact used...
Standard approaches to measurement of the ‘impact’ of academic journals, or even sometimes of indivi...
Citations to published scientific articles are regularly collected and processed, bringing about the...
We investigate how textual properties of scientific papers relate to the number of citations they re...
Citations remain a prime, yet controversial, measure of academic performance. Ideally, how often a p...
How do the level of usage of an article, the timeframe of its usage and its subject area relate to t...
The number of citations received is considered an index of study quality and impact. We aimed to exa...
The relevance of citations is clear since they constitute a substantial part of most bibliometric in...
We investigate how textual properties of scientific papers relate to the number of citations they re...
In spite of previous research demonstrating the risks involved, and counsel against the practice as ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Springer in Scientometrics on 09/05/2016, ...
Scientometrics is one of the leading peer-reviewed journals in the field of Library and Information ...
Objective – The researchers investigated whether faculty use of the references in articles had a rel...
The number of citations a paper receives is the most commonly used measure of scientific impact. In ...
This paper analyses growth pattern, core journals and authors' distribution in the field of bibliome...
The citations count is flawed but it still the most common way of measuring the academic impact used...
Standard approaches to measurement of the ‘impact’ of academic journals, or even sometimes of indivi...