Standard approaches to measurement of the ‘impact’ of academic journals, or even sometimes of individual researchers or single research outputs, are typically not based on principled statistical methods for the analysis of citation data, through appropriate statistical models. Recent research has shown the value of such statistical modelling, for citations within a research discipline, for example in reproducing more faithfully the quality judgements of human assessors. In this project we study the strengths and weaknesses of statistical modelling approaches to citation-network data, and in so doing, uncover a deep theoretical connection between two otherwise unrelated journal ranking methods: PageRank and the Bradley–Terry model. We ex...
How are scholars ranked for promotion, tenure and honors? How can we improve the quantitative tools ...
Various journal-ranking algorithms have been proposed, most of them based on citation counts. This a...
Abstract. Researcher-level metrics assess a researcher’s publications and number of citations for ea...
Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with scepticism by the scientifi...
Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with scepticism by the scientifi...
Summary. Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with skepticism by the ...
The degree to which a scholar’s work is cited by others has been regarded as an indicator of its sci...
This paper aims to identify whether different weighted PageRank algorithms can be applied to author...
Hirsch’s h-index, Egghe’s g-index, total citation and publication counts, and five proposed new metr...
The ever-increasing competitiveness in the academic publishing market incentivizes journal editors t...
Citation counts are widely used as indicators of research quality to support or replace human peer r...
The number of citations has been used for measuring the significance of a paper. Moreover, we have t...
How are scholars ranked for promotion, tenure and honors? How can we improve the quantitative tools ...
Various journal-ranking algorithms have been proposed, most of them based on citation counts. This a...
Abstract. Researcher-level metrics assess a researcher’s publications and number of citations for ea...
Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with scepticism by the scientifi...
Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with scepticism by the scientifi...
Summary. Rankings of scholarly journals based on citation data are often met with skepticism by the ...
The degree to which a scholar’s work is cited by others has been regarded as an indicator of its sci...
This paper aims to identify whether different weighted PageRank algorithms can be applied to author...
Hirsch’s h-index, Egghe’s g-index, total citation and publication counts, and five proposed new metr...
The ever-increasing competitiveness in the academic publishing market incentivizes journal editors t...
Citation counts are widely used as indicators of research quality to support or replace human peer r...
The number of citations has been used for measuring the significance of a paper. Moreover, we have t...
How are scholars ranked for promotion, tenure and honors? How can we improve the quantitative tools ...
Various journal-ranking algorithms have been proposed, most of them based on citation counts. This a...
Abstract. Researcher-level metrics assess a researcher’s publications and number of citations for ea...