Add to ORKGThis brief essay addresses the ambiguities in the meaning of “consumer welfare” in antitrust, exploring the differences between the Williamson, Bork, and current understanding of that term. After weighing the alternatives it argues that the consumer welfare principle in antitrust should seek out that state of affairs in which output is maximized, consistent with sustainable competitio
The goals of antitrust law continue to be debated because there is no single goal that is unambiguou...
Populist antitrust notions suddenly are fashionable again. At their core is the view that antitrust ...
Whether antitrust policy should pursue a goal of general welfare or consumer welfare has been de...
This brief essay addresses the ambiguities in the meaning of “consumer welfare” in antitrust, explor...
Antitrust’s consumer welfare principle stands for the proposition that antitrust policy should encou...
Antitrust’s consumer welfare principle is accepted in some form by the entire Supreme Court and the ...
United States antitrust policy is said to promote some version of economic welfare. Antitrust promot...
The dominant view of antitrust policy in the United States is that it is intended to promote some ve...
Writing 35 years ago in The Antitrust Paradox, Robert Bork observed, “Antitrust policy cannot be mad...
The consumer welfare standard in antitrust has been heavily criticized. But would, in fact, abandoni...
Of all Robert Bork’s many important contributions to antitrust law, none was more significant than h...
Modern antitrust policy follows the consumer welfare principle (CWP), the proposition that antitrust...
This Article critiques the role that the partial equilibrium trade-off paradigm plays in the debate ...
In this paper, we discuss the problem of the rule of reason and the welfare standard in antitrust. W...
The goals of antitrust law continue to be debated because there is no single goal that is unambiguou...
The goals of antitrust law continue to be debated because there is no single goal that is unambiguou...
Populist antitrust notions suddenly are fashionable again. At their core is the view that antitrust ...
Whether antitrust policy should pursue a goal of general welfare or consumer welfare has been de...
This brief essay addresses the ambiguities in the meaning of “consumer welfare” in antitrust, explor...
Antitrust’s consumer welfare principle stands for the proposition that antitrust policy should encou...
Antitrust’s consumer welfare principle is accepted in some form by the entire Supreme Court and the ...
United States antitrust policy is said to promote some version of economic welfare. Antitrust promot...
The dominant view of antitrust policy in the United States is that it is intended to promote some ve...
Writing 35 years ago in The Antitrust Paradox, Robert Bork observed, “Antitrust policy cannot be mad...
The consumer welfare standard in antitrust has been heavily criticized. But would, in fact, abandoni...
Of all Robert Bork’s many important contributions to antitrust law, none was more significant than h...
Modern antitrust policy follows the consumer welfare principle (CWP), the proposition that antitrust...
This Article critiques the role that the partial equilibrium trade-off paradigm plays in the debate ...
In this paper, we discuss the problem of the rule of reason and the welfare standard in antitrust. W...
The goals of antitrust law continue to be debated because there is no single goal that is unambiguou...
The goals of antitrust law continue to be debated because there is no single goal that is unambiguou...
Populist antitrust notions suddenly are fashionable again. At their core is the view that antitrust ...
Whether antitrust policy should pursue a goal of general welfare or consumer welfare has been de...