This is the second edition of Professor Charles\u27 aptly titled Handbook. The first edition was a simple reprint of a thirty-three page article that was originally published in the Canadian Cases on the Law of Torts, together with the 1978 Supreme Court Trilogy judgements themselves. While it provided a convenient capsulization of the issues, it clearly lacked the depth necessary to deal fully with many of the complexities involved, and the rationale for its publication was questionable (no matter how eminent its author or handsome its presentation, can any case comment really be worth $40.00?). Happily, the second edition has developed into a succinct and accurate enunciation of the established principles of common-law accident compen...
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has generated not only new terrain over which discursive...
The reticence of Canadian courts to substantively develop tort law beyond the ambit of English prece...
The late Antonio Lamer took the lead, under the Charter, in constitutionalizing the substantive crim...
Reasoning with the Charter by Leon Trakman is a timely and useful book. It is timely because in th...
Section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms confers on the courts the power to awar...
In this short essay, Professor Sharpe outlines the challenge that faces the courts in fashioning sui...
Book review of Charter Justice in Canadian Criminal Law by Don Stuart and published by Carswell (Sca...
Ward is the first case in the Supreme Court of Canada where the lower courts had dismissed the tort ...
In 2010, the Supreme Court of Canadas decision in Vancouver (City) v Ward created a framework for a ...
Little need be said about the merits of this, without doubt, the best case book available upon the l...
“Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages ...
The common law involves a continuous process of evolution whereby old rules are modified and new rul...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages u...
The law of obligations concerns the legal rights and duties owed between people. Three primary categ...
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has generated not only new terrain over which discursive...
The reticence of Canadian courts to substantively develop tort law beyond the ambit of English prece...
The late Antonio Lamer took the lead, under the Charter, in constitutionalizing the substantive crim...
Reasoning with the Charter by Leon Trakman is a timely and useful book. It is timely because in th...
Section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms confers on the courts the power to awar...
In this short essay, Professor Sharpe outlines the challenge that faces the courts in fashioning sui...
Book review of Charter Justice in Canadian Criminal Law by Don Stuart and published by Carswell (Sca...
Ward is the first case in the Supreme Court of Canada where the lower courts had dismissed the tort ...
In 2010, the Supreme Court of Canadas decision in Vancouver (City) v Ward created a framework for a ...
Little need be said about the merits of this, without doubt, the best case book available upon the l...
“Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages ...
The common law involves a continuous process of evolution whereby old rules are modified and new rul...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages u...
The law of obligations concerns the legal rights and duties owed between people. Three primary categ...
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has generated not only new terrain over which discursive...
The reticence of Canadian courts to substantively develop tort law beyond the ambit of English prece...
The late Antonio Lamer took the lead, under the Charter, in constitutionalizing the substantive crim...
.svg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG