In this short essay, Professor Sharpe outlines the challenge that faces the courts in fashioning suitable remedies in Charter litigation. In particular, he recommends that Canadian courts should look to the American experience and adopt it to the Canadian situation. He maintains that there is a constitutional mandate for the innovative and imaginative use of injunctive relief in Charter cases, especially in suits involving structural and institutional claims
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
What would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have looked like if it had been designed for ...
With three decades of jurisprudence to Canada’s account, the authors consider the common law doctrin...
In this short essay, Professor Sharpe outlines the challenge that faces the courts in fashioning sui...
Beetz J. made a superb contribution to the public law of Canada. His views were always thoughtful, b...
The issue addressed in this paper is whether we have effective remedies for breach of Charter protec...
Section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms confers on the courts the power to awar...
In this paper, the author examines the implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Dou...
Concentrating on Canadian experience, specifically litigation under the Canadian Charter of Rights a...
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter...
Three recent judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada signal a departure from the broad and generous...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
This is the second edition of Professor Charles\u27 aptly titled Handbook. The first edition was a s...
In this article we consider the scope of social and economic rights litigation under the Charter of ...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
What would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have looked like if it had been designed for ...
With three decades of jurisprudence to Canada’s account, the authors consider the common law doctrin...
In this short essay, Professor Sharpe outlines the challenge that faces the courts in fashioning sui...
Beetz J. made a superb contribution to the public law of Canada. His views were always thoughtful, b...
The issue addressed in this paper is whether we have effective remedies for breach of Charter protec...
Section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms confers on the courts the power to awar...
In this paper, the author examines the implications of the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Dou...
Concentrating on Canadian experience, specifically litigation under the Canadian Charter of Rights a...
This article responds to the argument that judicial review of legislation under the Canadian Charter...
Three recent judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada signal a departure from the broad and generous...
The text of the Charter separates the rights conferred from reasonable limits which may justifiably ...
For those concerned about the democratic legitimacy of Charter review by Canadian courts, the idea o...
This is the second edition of Professor Charles\u27 aptly titled Handbook. The first edition was a s...
In this article we consider the scope of social and economic rights litigation under the Charter of ...
The proponents of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are fighting a mighty battle to show that, desp...
What would the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have looked like if it had been designed for ...
With three decades of jurisprudence to Canada’s account, the authors consider the common law doctrin...