Estetska revolucija: Schlegel, Malraux in Rancière s Schillerjem

In his recent works Jacques Rancière has frequently discussed the notion of the “aesthetic revolution,” which was in his view indirectly announced by Friedrich Schiller in his On the Aesthetic Education of Man (1795). It purportedly signified the advent of new art or, rather, its new “aesthetic regime” with which Rancière wished to replace in his view the incorrect but solidly established notions of modernism and postmodernism. The article points out some of the interpretations of the “aesthetic revolution” as it can be found in Friedrich Schlegel and in André Malraux and which contain some similarities with Rancière’s designation. The author at the same time points out the significance of the “aesthetic revolution” in plural, with the aid of which we can in his opinion productively explain the plurality of such revolutions in the previous century which exist in the intermediate space between art and politics and between artistic autonomy and heteronomy.Jacques Rancière je v svojih novejših delih pogosto obravnaval pojem »estetske revolucije«, ki naj bi jo posredno razglasil Friedrich Schiller v delu O estetski vzgoji človeka (1795). Pomenila naj bi nastop nove umetnosti, oziroma njenega »estetskega režima«, s katerim je želel Rancière nadomestiti po njegovem mnenju neustrezna, čeprav močno uveljavljena, koncepta modernizma in postmodernizma. V članku avtor opozori na nekatere interpretacije »estetske revolucije« kot jih najdemo pri Friedrichu Schleglu in Andréju Malrauxu in ki vsebujejo nekatere podobnosti z Rancièrovo razlago. Avtor hkrati opozori na pomen estetske revolucije v množini, s pomočjo katere lahko po njegovem mnenju produktivno razložimo mnoštvo tovrstnih revolucij v preteklem stoletju in ki se gibljejo v vmesnem prostoru med umetnostjo in politiko ter umetnostno avtonomijo in heteronomijo