Add to ORKGPart I of this Article establishes that the government has a right to search for and seize evidence of crime. Part II develops the corollary proposition that the fourth amendment does not protect the right to secrete evidence of crime. Part III explores the impact of the reasonable expectation of privacy concept on the innocent. Part IV evaluates consent searches and their effect on the innocent. Finally, Part V considers the exclusionary rule as a device for protecting the innocent
A large percentage of fourth amendment litigation involves the issues of applicability to place, wai...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
There is a well-recognized lack of consistency and clarity in fourth amendment decisions. At times, ...
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the ex...
The fourth amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, pape...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
While there are a great many cases and commentaries treating fourth amendment rights, little attenti...
Part I of this Article defines searches and seizures of property and person, discussing the Supreme ...
This Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive l...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
The history of liberty, Justice Felix Frankfurter once noted, has largely been the history of obse...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
A large percentage of fourth amendment litigation involves the issues of applicability to place, wai...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
There is a well-recognized lack of consistency and clarity in fourth amendment decisions. At times, ...
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the ex...
The fourth amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, pape...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
While there are a great many cases and commentaries treating fourth amendment rights, little attenti...
Part I of this Article defines searches and seizures of property and person, discussing the Supreme ...
This Article is about the misunderstood relationship between the Fourth Amendment and the positive l...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
The history of liberty, Justice Felix Frankfurter once noted, has largely been the history of obse...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
A large percentage of fourth amendment litigation involves the issues of applicability to place, wai...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
There is a well-recognized lack of consistency and clarity in fourth amendment decisions. At times, ...