For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula in fourth amendment cases to decide the threshold question whether government activity amounted to a search. By predicating fourth amendment protection on a threat to the interest protected by that provision, the adoption of this formula marked a significant advance in fourth amendment analysis. The Court\u27s description of that privacy interest, however, overly constricts fourth amendment protection by limiting it to cases in which one had a reasonable expectation of privacy. This analysis overlooks the purpose for protecting an interest in privacy: privacy is protected not only for its own sake, but also because it facilitates the enjoyment...
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the ex...
Part I of this article offers a brief history of the development of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence a...
This Comment attributes the inadequacies of the Burger Court\u27s application of Katz to that Court\...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
Recent Supreme Court search and seizure cases are the harbingers of a new conceptual way of analyzin...
Part I of this Article briefly discusses the history and origins of the Fourth Amendment and its rel...
Technology has transformed government surveillance and opened traditionally private information to o...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
In sum, the Court has in recent years balanced the degree of government intrusion of the individual ...
Because the Fourth Amendment regulates only governmental conduct, the behavior of private actors is ...
This Article reports an attempt to investigate empirically important aspects of the Fourth Amendment...
This Article rehearses a response to the problems posed to and by the Supreme Court\u27s attempts to...
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits unreasonable searches and se...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the ex...
Part I of this article offers a brief history of the development of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence a...
This Comment attributes the inadequacies of the Burger Court\u27s application of Katz to that Court\...
For almost twenty years the Supreme Court has used the reasonable expectation of privacy formula i...
This Article attempts at a minimum to offer a common background and frame of reference for defining ...
Recent Supreme Court search and seizure cases are the harbingers of a new conceptual way of analyzin...
Part I of this Article briefly discusses the history and origins of the Fourth Amendment and its rel...
Technology has transformed government surveillance and opened traditionally private information to o...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
In sum, the Court has in recent years balanced the degree of government intrusion of the individual ...
Because the Fourth Amendment regulates only governmental conduct, the behavior of private actors is ...
This Article reports an attempt to investigate empirically important aspects of the Fourth Amendment...
This Article rehearses a response to the problems posed to and by the Supreme Court\u27s attempts to...
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits unreasonable searches and se...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
This Article does not endeavor to engage in a debate over the efficacy or deterrent effect of the ex...
Part I of this article offers a brief history of the development of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence a...
This Comment attributes the inadequacies of the Burger Court\u27s application of Katz to that Court\...