\u3cp\u3eThe paper presents a paradoxical feature of computational systems that suggests that computationalism cannot explain symbol grounding. If the mind is a digital computer, as computationalism claims, then it can be computing either over meaningful symbols or over meaningless symbols. If it is computing over meaningful symbols its functioning presupposes the existence of meaningful symbols in the system, i.e. it implies semantic nativism. If the mind is computing over meaningless symbols, no intentional cognitive processes are available prior to symbol grounding. In this case, no symbol grounding could take place since any grounding presupposes intentional cognitive processes. So, whether computing in the mind is over meaningless or o...
There is a prevalent notion among cognitive scientists and philosophers of mind that computers are m...
One of the interesting questions in cognitive science seems to be whether human beings are already p...
In response to Searle's well-known Chinese room argument against Strong AI (and more generally, comp...
Computation is interpretable symbol manipulation. Symbols are objects that are manipulated on the ba...
The aim of the paper is to present the underlying reason of the unsolved symbolgrounding problem. Th...
"Symbol Grounding" is beginning to mean too many things to too many people. My own construal has alw...
I see four symbol grounding problems: 1) How can a purely computational mind acquire meaningful symb...
\u3cp\u3eFloridi and Taddeo propose a condition of 'zero semantic commitment' for solutions to the g...
Abstract. Over the past several decades, the philosophical community has witnessed the emergence of ...
The mainstream view in cognitive science is that computation lies at the basis of and explains cogni...
In the nineteen eighties, a lot of ink was spent on the question of symbol grounding, largely trigge...
Since Hobbes, thinking has been described as computation. The creation of digital computers provided...
It is unlikely that the systematic, compositional properties of formal symbol systems -- i.e., of co...
According to the traditional conception of the mind, semantical content is per-haps the most importa...
The central claim of computationalism is generally taken to be that the brain is a computer, and tha...
There is a prevalent notion among cognitive scientists and philosophers of mind that computers are m...
One of the interesting questions in cognitive science seems to be whether human beings are already p...
In response to Searle's well-known Chinese room argument against Strong AI (and more generally, comp...
Computation is interpretable symbol manipulation. Symbols are objects that are manipulated on the ba...
The aim of the paper is to present the underlying reason of the unsolved symbolgrounding problem. Th...
"Symbol Grounding" is beginning to mean too many things to too many people. My own construal has alw...
I see four symbol grounding problems: 1) How can a purely computational mind acquire meaningful symb...
\u3cp\u3eFloridi and Taddeo propose a condition of 'zero semantic commitment' for solutions to the g...
Abstract. Over the past several decades, the philosophical community has witnessed the emergence of ...
The mainstream view in cognitive science is that computation lies at the basis of and explains cogni...
In the nineteen eighties, a lot of ink was spent on the question of symbol grounding, largely trigge...
Since Hobbes, thinking has been described as computation. The creation of digital computers provided...
It is unlikely that the systematic, compositional properties of formal symbol systems -- i.e., of co...
According to the traditional conception of the mind, semantical content is per-haps the most importa...
The central claim of computationalism is generally taken to be that the brain is a computer, and tha...
There is a prevalent notion among cognitive scientists and philosophers of mind that computers are m...
One of the interesting questions in cognitive science seems to be whether human beings are already p...
In response to Searle's well-known Chinese room argument against Strong AI (and more generally, comp...