Introduction Systematic reviews fulfil a vital role in modern medicine.1 However, the results of systematic reviews are only as valid as the studies they include.2 Pooling flawed, or biased, results from different studies can compromise the credibility of systematic review findings. Bias is a systematic deviation from the truth in the results of a research study tha
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privil...
Objectives: The validity of outcomes of systematic reviews is highly dependent on the extent of bias...
BACKGROUND: An assessment of the validity of individual diagnostic accuracy studies in systematic re...
MR was supported by a Health Research Board (Ireland)—Trials Methodology Research Network Summer Stu...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
AbstractObjectiveTo develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
peer-reviewedBackground: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisio...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privil...
Objectives: The validity of outcomes of systematic reviews is highly dependent on the extent of bias...
BACKGROUND: An assessment of the validity of individual diagnostic accuracy studies in systematic re...
MR was supported by a Health Research Board (Ireland)—Trials Methodology Research Network Summer Stu...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
AbstractObjectiveTo develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
peer-reviewedBackground: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisio...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...
Objective: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather...