MR was supported by a Health Research Board (Ireland)—Trials Methodology Research Network Summer Student Scholarship.Peer reviewedPublisher PD
Objectives Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias assessments for random...
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies th...
International audienceOBJECTIVES: Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias...
peer-reviewedBackground: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisio...
Background: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Yet, we o...
Background: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Yet, we o...
Abstract Background Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Y...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
Objectives: The validity of outcomes of systematic reviews is highly dependent on the extent of bias...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
Introduction Systematic reviews fulfil a vital role in modern medicine.1 However, the results of sy...
To evaluate the reliability of risk of bias assessments based on published trial reports, for determ...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privil...
Objectives Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias assessments for random...
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies th...
International audienceOBJECTIVES: Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias...
peer-reviewedBackground: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisio...
Background: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Yet, we o...
Background: Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Yet, we o...
Abstract Background Systematic reviews of randomised trials guide policy and healthcare decisions. Y...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
Objectives: The validity of outcomes of systematic reviews is highly dependent on the extent of bias...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorp...
Introduction Systematic reviews fulfil a vital role in modern medicine.1 However, the results of sy...
To evaluate the reliability of risk of bias assessments based on published trial reports, for determ...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privil...
Objectives Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias assessments for random...
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies th...
International audienceOBJECTIVES: Assess the frequency and reasons for disagreements in risk of bias...