This article suggests that the determination of obscenity in cases should be sent to the jury to determine under proper instructions rather than judges because the jury reflects the community\u27s morals and mores more truly than even the wisest of judges. The jury is the mechanism provided by the common law for determination of questions involving the presence or absence of due care, reasonableness, prudence, decency and other concepts reflecting the common sense and/or conscience of a community. Specifically, this article argues that the obscenity determination should be determined with reference to the time and place of the community of the jury
Obscenity is a register of marginal speech, that which is to be kept off the public stage. This pape...
The purpose of this Article is to examine critically the rationale of those decisions and to assess ...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s approach to obscenity. The author suggests that, during...
According to the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis v. Ohio, the Supreme Court itself must...
Few problems have plagued the courts in the last decade with greater persistence than those associat...
The degree to which the Supreme Court has been willing to support the libertarian claims of obscenit...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
Ohio\u27s new obscenity statutes enacted in 1972 and made effective on January 1, 1974 are interesti...
In recent obscenity cases, the Supreme Court has been attempting to define the constitutional meanin...
This Article critiques the approach endorsed in Hamling, particularly regarding the Court\u27s failu...
“In its latest attempt to define a workable standard for obscenity rulings, the United States Suprem...
In 1957, the Supreme Court decided Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California, and thereby comm...
The first portion of this article examines obscenity regulation both in the federal arena and in Nor...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
Obscenity is a register of marginal speech, that which is to be kept off the public stage. This pape...
The purpose of this Article is to examine critically the rationale of those decisions and to assess ...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s approach to obscenity. The author suggests that, during...
According to the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis v. Ohio, the Supreme Court itself must...
Few problems have plagued the courts in the last decade with greater persistence than those associat...
The degree to which the Supreme Court has been willing to support the libertarian claims of obscenit...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
Ohio\u27s new obscenity statutes enacted in 1972 and made effective on January 1, 1974 are interesti...
In recent obscenity cases, the Supreme Court has been attempting to define the constitutional meanin...
This Article critiques the approach endorsed in Hamling, particularly regarding the Court\u27s failu...
“In its latest attempt to define a workable standard for obscenity rulings, the United States Suprem...
In 1957, the Supreme Court decided Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California, and thereby comm...
The first portion of this article examines obscenity regulation both in the federal arena and in Nor...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
Obscenity is a register of marginal speech, that which is to be kept off the public stage. This pape...
The purpose of this Article is to examine critically the rationale of those decisions and to assess ...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s approach to obscenity. The author suggests that, during...