Add to ORKGThe first portion of this article examines obscenity regulation both in the federal arena and in North Carolina and looks briefly at how we got to where we are today. The second part examines the current North Carolina statute and the constitutional problems which are inextricably connected with it. The final section considers directions that the courts (or legislature) should take in consideration of the new North Carolina statute
Ohio\u27s new obscenity statutes enacted in 1972 and made effective on January 1, 1974 are interesti...
For many years, courts all over the United States have told us what kind of movies we can watch,4 wh...
I. Introduction II. The First Amendment and Governmental Power to Repress Speech III. The Old Argume...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
North Carolina, like other states, has chosen to regulate the dissemination of obscenity through a n...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
The purpose of this Article is to examine critically the rationale of those decisions and to assess ...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s approach to obscenity. The author suggests that, during...
According to the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis v. Ohio, the Supreme Court itself must...
Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor R...
The United States Supreme Court generally provides an accurate reflection of the times
The degree to which the Supreme Court has been willing to support the libertarian claims of obscenit...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
In recent obscenity cases, the Supreme Court has been attempting to define the constitutional meanin...
In October, 1967 Congress established an advisory commission (1) to study the effect of obscenity up...
Ohio\u27s new obscenity statutes enacted in 1972 and made effective on January 1, 1974 are interesti...
For many years, courts all over the United States have told us what kind of movies we can watch,4 wh...
I. Introduction II. The First Amendment and Governmental Power to Repress Speech III. The Old Argume...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
North Carolina, like other states, has chosen to regulate the dissemination of obscenity through a n...
Interest in obscenity laws, in the reason and purpose for their being, their efficacy in achieving t...
The purpose of this Article is to examine critically the rationale of those decisions and to assess ...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s approach to obscenity. The author suggests that, during...
According to the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis v. Ohio, the Supreme Court itself must...
Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor R...
The United States Supreme Court generally provides an accurate reflection of the times
The degree to which the Supreme Court has been willing to support the libertarian claims of obscenit...
From 1957 to 1973, the United States Supreme Court was in the process of articulating and refining t...
In recent obscenity cases, the Supreme Court has been attempting to define the constitutional meanin...
In October, 1967 Congress established an advisory commission (1) to study the effect of obscenity up...
Ohio\u27s new obscenity statutes enacted in 1972 and made effective on January 1, 1974 are interesti...
For many years, courts all over the United States have told us what kind of movies we can watch,4 wh...
I. Introduction II. The First Amendment and Governmental Power to Repress Speech III. The Old Argume...