The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of personal characteristics, institutional factors, and time-competing workplace requirements on scholarly productivity in peer-reviewed economics journals. The study utilizes a unique data set of individual-specific information for 714 academic economists. The multivariate regression analysis shows that both teaching and service commitments reduce scholarly work in peer reviewed journals. The paper also presents an analysis of the data disaggregated by gender. While the impact of teaching and service on productivity appears roughly similar, the results indicate that collaborative efforts, whether formal or informal, benefit women’s publication efforts more tha...
This paper compares the average productivity of males and females in a set of 2,530 highly productiv...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
The past academic gender literature has focused on the underproduction of academic women in research...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
This study uses data from Academic Analytics to examine gender differences in promotion to associate...
Abstract The variations in research productivity available in the scholarly world, between men and w...
This study uses data from Academic Analytics to examine gender differences in promotion to associate...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
Abstract The variations in research productivity available in the scholarly world, between men and w...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
This article examines gender differences in publication productivity and factors correlated with hig...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This paper compares the average productivity of males and females in a set of 2,530 highly productiv...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
The past academic gender literature has focused on the underproduction of academic women in research...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
This study uses data from Academic Analytics to examine gender differences in promotion to associate...
Abstract The variations in research productivity available in the scholarly world, between men and w...
This study uses data from Academic Analytics to examine gender differences in promotion to associate...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
Abstract The variations in research productivity available in the scholarly world, between men and w...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
This article examines gender differences in publication productivity and factors correlated with hig...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This paper compares the average productivity of males and females in a set of 2,530 highly productiv...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...
This article examines the impact of gender on researchers’ journal selection decisions, and thereby ...