This article examines gender differences in publication productivity and factors correlated with high productivity in Australian universities, during the periods 1991–3 and 2005–7. Measured as a weighted sum of books and journal articles, females reported significantly fewer publications than men during both periods. Gender differences appear to have reduced over time, with female publishing increasing from 57 percent of the male average in 1991–3 to 76 percent in 2005–7. Statistical analyses reveal that women published at similar levels to men of equal rank during both periods, except among Level A staff in 1991–3 where males published significantly more. Academic rank, doctorate qualifications, research time and international research col...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...
The past academic gender literature has focused on the underproduction of academic women in research...
This thesis is a comparative and empirical analysis of gender differences in research pr...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
This paper examines whether women and men publish journal articles at a level comparable with their ...
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of personal characteristics, institutional factor...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
The paper presents the results of an examination of gender differences in scientific productivity on...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...
The past academic gender literature has focused on the underproduction of academic women in research...
This thesis is a comparative and empirical analysis of gender differences in research pr...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
Measures of research productivity have become widely used for obtaining tenure, third party funding,...
This paper examines whether women and men publish journal articles at a level comparable with their ...
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of personal characteristics, institutional factor...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
It is often argued that female researchers publish on average less than male researchers do, but mal...
The paper presents the results of an examination of gender differences in scientific productivity on...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
Sex differences in human performance have been documented across a wide array of human endeavours. M...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...
International audienceWe examine gender differences among the six PhD student cohorts 2004–2009 at t...