The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 was enacted to protect private individuals from unjust termination or denial of job opportunities resulting from unwarranted polygraph tests. The Act, however, allows private employers to continue using polygraphs as part of ongoing investigations of employee misconduct. This Comment examines the ambiguous language of this exemption that courts will encounter when determining whether employers have violated the Act. The Comment proposes that, unless legislative history or federal regulations indicate otherwise, ambiguities in the specific incident exemption should be broadly construed to avoid employer liability
Polygraph tests rely on the hypothesis that a subject\u27s body yields physiologically different sym...
The Act establishes procedures for polygraph examiners and provdes examinees with certain rights inc...
Includes bibliographical referencesThe South African labour market is, after the enactment of the Co...
The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 was enacted to protect private individuals from unjust...
Defamation and invasion of privacy occur routinely during the administration of polygraph examinatio...
Lie detector testing originated as a means for conducting criminal investigations. In recent years, ...
Two types of laws govern the use of polygraphs in the employment setting: those aimed at restricting...
Criticism of personality and polygraph testing has taken three forms: challenges to the reliability ...
This Comment argues that the most appropriate test for applying the statutory definition of miscondu...
The use of polygraph testing in the applicant screening process for law enforcement positions is wi...
Many private employers have begun testing job applicants and employees for illegal drug use. This co...
In this Comment, Professor Shoben advocates the use of a statistical technique—a test of the differe...
The Supreme Court in Albemarle held that the company\u27s employee testing practices violated Title ...
Confidential employees are not expressly excluded from the National Labor Relations Act. Recognizing...
LL.M. (Labour Law)Commentators have warned that when men are given absolute control over their fello...
Polygraph tests rely on the hypothesis that a subject\u27s body yields physiologically different sym...
The Act establishes procedures for polygraph examiners and provdes examinees with certain rights inc...
Includes bibliographical referencesThe South African labour market is, after the enactment of the Co...
The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 was enacted to protect private individuals from unjust...
Defamation and invasion of privacy occur routinely during the administration of polygraph examinatio...
Lie detector testing originated as a means for conducting criminal investigations. In recent years, ...
Two types of laws govern the use of polygraphs in the employment setting: those aimed at restricting...
Criticism of personality and polygraph testing has taken three forms: challenges to the reliability ...
This Comment argues that the most appropriate test for applying the statutory definition of miscondu...
The use of polygraph testing in the applicant screening process for law enforcement positions is wi...
Many private employers have begun testing job applicants and employees for illegal drug use. This co...
In this Comment, Professor Shoben advocates the use of a statistical technique—a test of the differe...
The Supreme Court in Albemarle held that the company\u27s employee testing practices violated Title ...
Confidential employees are not expressly excluded from the National Labor Relations Act. Recognizing...
LL.M. (Labour Law)Commentators have warned that when men are given absolute control over their fello...
Polygraph tests rely on the hypothesis that a subject\u27s body yields physiologically different sym...
The Act establishes procedures for polygraph examiners and provdes examinees with certain rights inc...
Includes bibliographical referencesThe South African labour market is, after the enactment of the Co...