Waterfront property, though extremely popular in Washington, presents problems of ownership with which few residents are familiar. The effect of transitory water boundaries upon the divisible proprietary interests is especially complex since the present status of such boundaries is uncertain under our court\u27s interpretation of the applicable statutes
The Washington State Supreme Court struck down the temporary shoreline development moratorium at iss...
Entering a navigable body of water from the upland, and navigating from the point of access to dist...
With approval of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), Washington has joined the increasing ra...
The determination of the boundary between public and private areas of the shoreline can be a topic o...
Under Washington\u27s public trust doctrine, the state retains a jus publicum interest in tidelands,...
Problems arising from disputed boundaries between adjacent land owners are of real importance to the...
The general water policy applicable to unappropriated land within Washington Territory was that of p...
This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a ...
Since 1971 the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) has been the dominant legal tool for managing the Wash...
This Article provides a summary of the Maine common law of riparian boundaries. It is geared toward ...
The purpose of this article is to assist in the re-examination of Washington water law by looking at...
There is no particular policy reason why the same line should be used for both the upland boundary o...
The need for water in this state was destined to play a vital part in the development of the law of ...
In Virginia, private landowners own the land to the Mean Low Water mark (“MLW”), whereas in many coa...
Action by a water district to appropriate and condemn water for domestic uses from a nonnavigable la...
The Washington State Supreme Court struck down the temporary shoreline development moratorium at iss...
Entering a navigable body of water from the upland, and navigating from the point of access to dist...
With approval of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), Washington has joined the increasing ra...
The determination of the boundary between public and private areas of the shoreline can be a topic o...
Under Washington\u27s public trust doctrine, the state retains a jus publicum interest in tidelands,...
Problems arising from disputed boundaries between adjacent land owners are of real importance to the...
The general water policy applicable to unappropriated land within Washington Territory was that of p...
This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a ...
Since 1971 the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) has been the dominant legal tool for managing the Wash...
This Article provides a summary of the Maine common law of riparian boundaries. It is geared toward ...
The purpose of this article is to assist in the re-examination of Washington water law by looking at...
There is no particular policy reason why the same line should be used for both the upland boundary o...
The need for water in this state was destined to play a vital part in the development of the law of ...
In Virginia, private landowners own the land to the Mean Low Water mark (“MLW”), whereas in many coa...
Action by a water district to appropriate and condemn water for domestic uses from a nonnavigable la...
The Washington State Supreme Court struck down the temporary shoreline development moratorium at iss...
Entering a navigable body of water from the upland, and navigating from the point of access to dist...
With approval of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), Washington has joined the increasing ra...