This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a brief description of the historical and legal foundation of coastal resource allocation in the United States: the “public trust doctrine.” Second, a survey of the Washington experience demonstrates, surprisingly, that a state whose 2,337 miles of marine coastline approximately equals the length of the entire remaining coastline of the contiguous western United States, has managed to establish a viable and responsive regulatory regime governing coastal resource use with scarcely a mention in its laws of the “public trust doctrine.
<p>Sustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved extremely difficult, with few success stories. ...
The United States has a north coast along its ‘inland seas’—the Laurentian Great Lakes. The country ...
This article explores the development of public trust principles from early Roman and British law th...
This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a ...
The public trust doctrine is an ancient doctrine that has recently emerged as a powerful tool to pro...
Since 1971 the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) has been the dominant legal tool for managing the Wash...
Under Washington\u27s public trust doctrine, the state retains a jus publicum interest in tidelands,...
During the past 15 years, in half the United States, more than 100 reported cases involving the publ...
Following decades of neglecting its public trust duties, Washington now accepts the public trust doc...
Under the public trust doctrine, a state must hold certain types of natural resources, most particul...
Oregon’s public trust doctrine has been misunderstood. The doctrine has not been judicially interpre...
The modern public trust doctrine compels each Great Lakes state to protect the sustainable future of...
With approval of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), Washington has joined the increasing ra...
Sustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved nearly impossible, with few success stories. Ecosy...
Waterfront property, though extremely popular in Washington, presents problems of ownership with whi...
<p>Sustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved extremely difficult, with few success stories. ...
The United States has a north coast along its ‘inland seas’—the Laurentian Great Lakes. The country ...
This article explores the development of public trust principles from early Roman and British law th...
This Article addresses questions of resource allocation and property rights, first, by presenting a ...
The public trust doctrine is an ancient doctrine that has recently emerged as a powerful tool to pro...
Since 1971 the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) has been the dominant legal tool for managing the Wash...
Under Washington\u27s public trust doctrine, the state retains a jus publicum interest in tidelands,...
During the past 15 years, in half the United States, more than 100 reported cases involving the publ...
Following decades of neglecting its public trust duties, Washington now accepts the public trust doc...
Under the public trust doctrine, a state must hold certain types of natural resources, most particul...
Oregon’s public trust doctrine has been misunderstood. The doctrine has not been judicially interpre...
The modern public trust doctrine compels each Great Lakes state to protect the sustainable future of...
With approval of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (SMA), Washington has joined the increasing ra...
Sustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved nearly impossible, with few success stories. Ecosy...
Waterfront property, though extremely popular in Washington, presents problems of ownership with whi...
<p>Sustainably managing marine ecosystems has proved extremely difficult, with few success stories. ...
The United States has a north coast along its ‘inland seas’—the Laurentian Great Lakes. The country ...
This article explores the development of public trust principles from early Roman and British law th...