Add to ORKGIt is impossible, without unduly extending the length of this article, to discuss in detail each paragraph of the new rules, but it is our purpose: (1) briefly to survey the historical background; (2) to discuss the principal changes effected in federal procedure through adoption of these rules, and the principal points of similarity and difference between the new federal procedure and our state procedure in Washington; and (3) to consider possible improvements in our state practice which might be adopted therefrom
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Response to Edward H. Cooper, Simplified Rules of Federal Procedure1, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1794 (2002
It is impossible, without unduly extending the length of this article, to discuss in detail each par...
In our first article on the historical background of the proposed new rules of civil procedure for t...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
A new era in federal practice, in suits of a civil nature whether cognizable as cases at law or in e...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court of the United S...
On January 2, 1957, the Supreme Court of Washington published the pleading and party rules, previous...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
In accordance with action taken at the July Convention of the Washington State Bar Association, the ...
In September, 1938 new rules of procedure were adopted in the federal courts. Since then many of the...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Response to Edward H. Cooper, Simplified Rules of Federal Procedure1, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1794 (2002
It is impossible, without unduly extending the length of this article, to discuss in detail each par...
In our first article on the historical background of the proposed new rules of civil procedure for t...
The amendments to the civil rules continue a process of transition from legal formulas toward adapta...
In this article we present a new survey of the civil procedures of the fifty states and the District...
A new era in federal practice, in suits of a civil nature whether cognizable as cases at law or in e...
This issue includes a notice informing subscribers that Congress took no action on the package of am...
The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted by the Supreme Court of the United S...
On January 2, 1957, the Supreme Court of Washington published the pleading and party rules, previous...
Writing in 1924, seventy-eight volumes ago, Professor Edson R. Sunderland began The Machinery of Pro...
In accordance with action taken at the July Convention of the Washington State Bar Association, the ...
In September, 1938 new rules of procedure were adopted in the federal courts. Since then many of the...
Though they originated as an insubstantial entity, United States Federal Courts have become a virtua...
Congress reformed the procedures for amending the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1988 by prescr...
Response to Edward H. Cooper, Simplified Rules of Federal Procedure1, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 1794 (2002