This comment examines the application of section 1359 to assignments and transfers which affect federal diversity jurisdiction. Throughout the following discussion, the focus is directed toward the determination of more uniform standards for the interpretation of the statute. The purpose of section 1359, from which general guidelines may be drawn, is examined in part I. Part II includes a survey of cases which have dealt with assignments and transfers to invoke or defeat federal diversity jurisdiction. Certain factors the courts have relied on, and certain rules they have developed, in attempting to answer the questions posed above will be explained, and the decisions will be evaluated in light of the guidelines established in part I
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
Since 1789, diversity of citizenship jurisdiction has been a staple of the American judicial system....
After years of pretrial and trial activities, a large corporate defendant discovers that it is a c...
An important group of cases over which the inferior federal courts in the United States have jurisdi...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
The Act of Congress of April 20, 1940, provided that district courts should exercise original jurisd...
There are four purposes of this article: First, to expose more fully the nature and dimensions of th...
Article III’s diversity jurisdiction provisions extend the federal judicial power to state law contr...
As a Yale Law professor, I have been teaching introductory civil procedure for over 30 years. Divers...
Part I of this Article briefly examines diversity jurisdiction generally and historically. Part II a...
Is federal diversity jurisdiction case specific or claim specific? The complete-diversity rule makes...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This Article argues that a federal court does not abdicate its duty to exercise its jurisdiction whe...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
Since 1789, diversity of citizenship jurisdiction has been a staple of the American judicial system....
After years of pretrial and trial activities, a large corporate defendant discovers that it is a c...
An important group of cases over which the inferior federal courts in the United States have jurisdi...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
The Act of Congress of April 20, 1940, provided that district courts should exercise original jurisd...
There are four purposes of this article: First, to expose more fully the nature and dimensions of th...
Article III’s diversity jurisdiction provisions extend the federal judicial power to state law contr...
As a Yale Law professor, I have been teaching introductory civil procedure for over 30 years. Divers...
Part I of this Article briefly examines diversity jurisdiction generally and historically. Part II a...
Is federal diversity jurisdiction case specific or claim specific? The complete-diversity rule makes...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This Article argues that a federal court does not abdicate its duty to exercise its jurisdiction whe...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
Since 1789, diversity of citizenship jurisdiction has been a staple of the American judicial system....
After years of pretrial and trial activities, a large corporate defendant discovers that it is a c...