The Act of Congress of April 20, 1940, provided that district courts should exercise original jurisdiction over actions between citizens of different States, or citizens of the District of Columbia, the Territory of Hawaii, or Alaska, and any State or Territory . . . . The committee report and the title indicate the purpose to extend to citizens of the District of Columbia and the territories the right to sue in federal district courts on grounds solely of diversity of citizenship. Although the committee reports indicated no constitutional difficulties, the majority of the lower federal courts which considered the problem declared the act unconstitutional on the ground that the limitations of Article III prevented the exercise of such ju...
Plaintiffs were United States citizens of Japanese ancestry domiciled in California. By order of the...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that in a limited partnership the ...
At the time the last session of Congress adjourned four important bills affecting the jurisdiction o...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
In the recent case of National Mutual Insurance Ca. v. Tidewater Transfer Co.,\u27 the Act of April ...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
An important group of cases over which the inferior federal courts in the United States have jurisdi...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This comment examines the application of section 1359 to assignments and transfers which affect fede...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
Article III’s diversity jurisdiction provisions extend the federal judicial power to state law contr...
Plaintiff, a citizen of France and resident of New York City, sought a declaratory judgment and rest...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York, instituted a stockholder\u27s suit on behalf of a New York corpora...
Plaintiffs were United States citizens of Japanese ancestry domiciled in California. By order of the...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that in a limited partnership the ...
At the time the last session of Congress adjourned four important bills affecting the jurisdiction o...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
In the recent case of National Mutual Insurance Ca. v. Tidewater Transfer Co.,\u27 the Act of April ...
Plaintiff, a District of Columbia corporation, sued defendant, a Nebraska corporation, in the Munici...
An important group of cases over which the inferior federal courts in the United States have jurisdi...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
This Note examines the language and legislative history of section 1367(b) and proposes a uniform te...
This comment examines the application of section 1359 to assignments and transfers which affect fede...
A recent congressional amendment of federal district court jurisdictional requirements for both dive...
In an effort to eliminate duplicative and wasteful litigation in both federal and state courts, rece...
Article III’s diversity jurisdiction provisions extend the federal judicial power to state law contr...
Plaintiff, a citizen of France and resident of New York City, sought a declaratory judgment and rest...
Plaintiff, a citizen of New York, instituted a stockholder\u27s suit on behalf of a New York corpora...
Plaintiffs were United States citizens of Japanese ancestry domiciled in California. By order of the...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that in a limited partnership the ...
At the time the last session of Congress adjourned four important bills affecting the jurisdiction o...