Topics
.png%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
common lawAgent
WashingtonPerson
By reducing the burden of proving a gift causa mortis where the state is the only contestant, In re McDonald\u27s Estate has evidently attached an exception to the Washington dead man\u27s statute. While eliminating the common law prohibition against testimony by an interested person, this statute does prohibit such persons from testifying concerning transactions with a decedent. It also prohibits testimony about statements made by a decedent
Motion by the Sheppard Estate arguing that evidence regarding the relationship between Dr. Samuel Sh...
This article examines State v. McLaughlin, 14 A.3d 720 (N.J. 2011) to illustrate the importance of t...
In order to understand why Dead Man\u27s statutes should be amended by state legislatures, it is imp...
By reducing the burden of proving a gift causa mortis where the state is the only contestant, In re ...
The Dead Man Statutes of the several states, which exclude testimony by interested parties in cert...
In an action against an executor to recover money alleged loaned to decedent, plaintiff introduced t...
Defendant, while driving an automobile, struck the plaintiff\u27s decedent, a pedestrian, causing in...
The Dead Man statutes, enacted in various forms in almost every state, generally forbid a party or...
Plaintiff filed a bill in chancery seeking a declaration of rights with respect to an automobile to ...
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit against decedent\u27s estate for specific performance of ...
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
It is the purpose of this article to provide a means of ready reference to all of the Washington cas...
Prior to entering the hospital to undergo a serious operation, the decedent wrote an informal note t...
In Crawford v. Washington and its progeny, the U.S. Supreme Court retheorized the relationship betwe...
Testatrix and her husband entered into an agreement that the survivor should devise property owned b...
Motion by the Sheppard Estate arguing that evidence regarding the relationship between Dr. Samuel Sh...
This article examines State v. McLaughlin, 14 A.3d 720 (N.J. 2011) to illustrate the importance of t...
In order to understand why Dead Man\u27s statutes should be amended by state legislatures, it is imp...
By reducing the burden of proving a gift causa mortis where the state is the only contestant, In re ...
The Dead Man Statutes of the several states, which exclude testimony by interested parties in cert...
In an action against an executor to recover money alleged loaned to decedent, plaintiff introduced t...
Defendant, while driving an automobile, struck the plaintiff\u27s decedent, a pedestrian, causing in...
The Dead Man statutes, enacted in various forms in almost every state, generally forbid a party or...
Plaintiff filed a bill in chancery seeking a declaration of rights with respect to an automobile to ...
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit against decedent\u27s estate for specific performance of ...
Covers cases on exceptions to the hearsay rule, on facts that must be included in hypothetical quest...
It is the purpose of this article to provide a means of ready reference to all of the Washington cas...
Prior to entering the hospital to undergo a serious operation, the decedent wrote an informal note t...
In Crawford v. Washington and its progeny, the U.S. Supreme Court retheorized the relationship betwe...
Testatrix and her husband entered into an agreement that the survivor should devise property owned b...
Motion by the Sheppard Estate arguing that evidence regarding the relationship between Dr. Samuel Sh...
This article examines State v. McLaughlin, 14 A.3d 720 (N.J. 2011) to illustrate the importance of t...
In order to understand why Dead Man\u27s statutes should be amended by state legislatures, it is imp...
Add to ORKG