Since the case of Ashford v. Reese, it has been a much mooted question as to the extent of a vendee\u27s rights under an executory contract for the sale of realty The purpose of this article is not to discuss the correctness of the rule of law as laid down in the Ashford case, but to examine the rights of a vendee, irrespective of the question as to whether or not he should have what is known in the law as an equitable title. Logically, even though the doctrine of equitable conversion be rejected, the vendee\u27s remedy of specific performance should not be affected
The state of title to an undetermined amount of realty in Washington was put in question by the Wash...
Testatrix devised a house and lot to the trustees of the First Methodist Church Oil the condition th...
Since the New York Code of 1848 abolished the distinctions, between actions at law and suits in equi...
Since the case of Ashford v. Reese, it has been a much mooted question as to the extent of a vendee\...
Almost two years have passed since the six-three decision in Ashford v. Reese, holding that in this ...
It has been held by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in a number of cases, that an execu...
The persistence with which our court clings to the unfortunate language of the leading case of Ashfo...
The principle of Ashford v. Reese does not yet seem to have come to rest. In the recent case of Aylw...
The principal thesis of this Article is that property and contract questions should not be solved in...
Since a man cannot transfer what is not his, a sale of property to be subsequently acquired by the v...
Among the many complexities of modem business and financial life none is fraught with more intricaci...
Covers cases on the conveyance of after-acquired title by quitclaim deed—effect of habendum clause
Since the 1925 decision of Ashford v. Reese, Washington has had the distinction of being the only Am...
Many assignees of the vendors\u27 interests in installment contracts for the sale of real estate sup...
Covers cases on declaration of homestead—excess value subject to judgment lien—good faith declaratio...
The state of title to an undetermined amount of realty in Washington was put in question by the Wash...
Testatrix devised a house and lot to the trustees of the First Methodist Church Oil the condition th...
Since the New York Code of 1848 abolished the distinctions, between actions at law and suits in equi...
Since the case of Ashford v. Reese, it has been a much mooted question as to the extent of a vendee\...
Almost two years have passed since the six-three decision in Ashford v. Reese, holding that in this ...
It has been held by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington in a number of cases, that an execu...
The persistence with which our court clings to the unfortunate language of the leading case of Ashfo...
The principle of Ashford v. Reese does not yet seem to have come to rest. In the recent case of Aylw...
The principal thesis of this Article is that property and contract questions should not be solved in...
Since a man cannot transfer what is not his, a sale of property to be subsequently acquired by the v...
Among the many complexities of modem business and financial life none is fraught with more intricaci...
Covers cases on the conveyance of after-acquired title by quitclaim deed—effect of habendum clause
Since the 1925 decision of Ashford v. Reese, Washington has had the distinction of being the only Am...
Many assignees of the vendors\u27 interests in installment contracts for the sale of real estate sup...
Covers cases on declaration of homestead—excess value subject to judgment lien—good faith declaratio...
The state of title to an undetermined amount of realty in Washington was put in question by the Wash...
Testatrix devised a house and lot to the trustees of the First Methodist Church Oil the condition th...
Since the New York Code of 1848 abolished the distinctions, between actions at law and suits in equi...