Add to ORKGIt is a firmly established rule in the federal courts, that evidence obtained by an illegal search and seizure, within the purview of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, is not admissible providing timely steps are taken for its exclusion or return. However, that rule is limited in its application to federal officers or agents, so that quite generally it may be said, that evidence obtained by private,mdividuals or municipal or state officers, acting as such, is admissible in federal courts, regardless of the manner in which it is obtained
In this case the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to three decision revised its earlier ...
The use of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases has been the subject of extensive debate since it...
The question whether illegality in the means of procuring evidence is a bar to its admissibility has...
The purpose of this Article is to examine the problem of use in federal court of evidence illegally ...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
At common law, illegally seized evidence was admissible on the theory that the nature of the seizure...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
The United States Supreme Court was recently called upon to consider a novel aspect of the problem o...
In this case the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to three decision revised its earlier ...
Federal customs enforcement officers suspected plaintiff of theft from a waterfront pier. In the cou...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that there is a federal cause of action founded dire...
After the terrorist attacks on September 11th, Congress greatly enhanced federal law enforcement pow...
A member of the Metropolitan Police of Washington, D.C. entered the hotel room of A and B for the pu...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
In this case the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to three decision revised its earlier ...
The use of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases has been the subject of extensive debate since it...
The question whether illegality in the means of procuring evidence is a bar to its admissibility has...
The purpose of this Article is to examine the problem of use in federal court of evidence illegally ...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
Two federal narcotic officers accompanied by two state officers went into the defendant\u27s residen...
At common law, illegally seized evidence was admissible on the theory that the nature of the seizure...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
The United States Supreme Court was recently called upon to consider a novel aspect of the problem o...
In this case the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to three decision revised its earlier ...
Federal customs enforcement officers suspected plaintiff of theft from a waterfront pier. In the cou...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that there is a federal cause of action founded dire...
After the terrorist attacks on September 11th, Congress greatly enhanced federal law enforcement pow...
A member of the Metropolitan Police of Washington, D.C. entered the hotel room of A and B for the pu...
In response to a call from a citizen whose suspicions had been aroused by the actions of the defenda...
In this case the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to three decision revised its earlier ...
The use of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases has been the subject of extensive debate since it...
The question whether illegality in the means of procuring evidence is a bar to its admissibility has...