Add to ORKGThis Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clause of both the state and federal constitutions to advocate for a constitutionally based right to counsel. This approach is detailed in the context of private child custody actions through examination and discussion of the Supreme Judicial Court’s April 2016 decision in L.B. v. Chief Justice of the Probate & Family Court Department. The Authors identify opportunities to protect and advocate for the right to counsel analysis, and to lobby the legislature for a child’s right to counsel in custody proceedings or a tenant’s right to counsel in eviction
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
An impoverished mother has no constitutional right to a lawyer\u27s help in resisting a state\u27s a...
As the Supreme Court put it a half century ago, the right tocounsel for juveniles reflects “society’...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Children have traditionally been denied separate counsel in divorce custody proceedings. The author ...
This Article discusses access to justice in the implementation of orders in family cases. Parenting,...
This Article addresses the concerns over the differences in the right to counsel in family law cases...
This comment will illustrate how allegations of child abuse in a divorce custody dispute dramaticall...
Around the country, state and local bar associations, access to justice commissions, and local advoc...
In this Article, Professor Lloyd Anderson examines the recent decision M.L.B. v. S.L.J., in which th...
In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court of the United States held that due p...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
An impoverished mother has no constitutional right to a lawyer\u27s help in resisting a state\u27s a...
As the Supreme Court put it a half century ago, the right tocounsel for juveniles reflects “society’...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Children have traditionally been denied separate counsel in divorce custody proceedings. The author ...
This Article discusses access to justice in the implementation of orders in family cases. Parenting,...
This Article addresses the concerns over the differences in the right to counsel in family law cases...
This comment will illustrate how allegations of child abuse in a divorce custody dispute dramaticall...
Around the country, state and local bar associations, access to justice commissions, and local advoc...
In this Article, Professor Lloyd Anderson examines the recent decision M.L.B. v. S.L.J., in which th...
In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court of the United States held that due p...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
This Article argues for recognition of a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in habeas cor...
An impoverished mother has no constitutional right to a lawyer\u27s help in resisting a state\u27s a...
As the Supreme Court put it a half century ago, the right tocounsel for juveniles reflects “society’...