Children have traditionally been denied separate counsel in divorce custody proceedings. The author discusses the constitutionality of this denial in the light of procedural due process guarantees announced by the Supreme Court. The note concludes that counsel is both necessary and justified either in the context of disputed custody or on a finding that the award has been reached without adequate consideration of the child\u27s interests
The way legislatures and courts view the role of children in the divorce process has changed dramati...
This Note contends that, based on the custody statute and relevant case law, the court of appeals sh...
In Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007), California’s Supreme Court asked the Judicial...
Children have traditionally been denied separate counsel in divorce custody proceedings. The author ...
This comment will illustrate how allegations of child abuse in a divorce custody dispute dramaticall...
The U.S. Supreme Court regards parental rights as fundamental. Such a status should subject any lega...
In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court of the United States held that due p...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
This paper considers the affect of amendments to state divorce laws that strengthen their joint cust...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
Few areas pose more difficult problems in the application of due process doctrine than does regulati...
The Court of Appeals of New York has held that an indigent parent faced with loss of a child\u27s so...
The way legislatures and courts view the role of children in the divorce process has changed dramati...
This Note contends that, based on the custody statute and relevant case law, the court of appeals sh...
In Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007), California’s Supreme Court asked the Judicial...
Children have traditionally been denied separate counsel in divorce custody proceedings. The author ...
This comment will illustrate how allegations of child abuse in a divorce custody dispute dramaticall...
The U.S. Supreme Court regards parental rights as fundamental. Such a status should subject any lega...
In Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, the Supreme Court of the United States held that due p...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
This paper considers the affect of amendments to state divorce laws that strengthen their joint cust...
Fourteenth Amendment rights of due process and equal protection have continually demanded the attent...
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
This Article explores the access to justice movement by appellate lawyers using the due process clau...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the Santosky presupposition and demonstrate why it is misd...
Few areas pose more difficult problems in the application of due process doctrine than does regulati...
The Court of Appeals of New York has held that an indigent parent faced with loss of a child\u27s so...
The way legislatures and courts view the role of children in the divorce process has changed dramati...
This Note contends that, based on the custody statute and relevant case law, the court of appeals sh...
In Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007), California’s Supreme Court asked the Judicial...