International audienceThis paper refines the game theoretic analysis of conversations in Asher et al. (J Philos Logic 46:355–404, 2017) by adding epistemic concepts to make explicit the intuitive idea that conversationalists typically conceive of conversational strategies in a situation of imperfect information. This ‘epistemic’ turn has important ramifications for linguistic analysis, and we illustrate our approach with a detailed treatment of linguistic examples
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doin...
Item does not contain fulltextIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conver...
In this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences with incons...
This paper refines the game theoretic analysis of conversations in Asher et al. (J Philos Logic 46:3...
International audienceThis paper refines the game theoretic analysis of conversations in Asher et al...
In this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infinite sequential games ...
International audienceIn this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infi...
In this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infinite sequential games ...
Conversations often involve an element of plan�ning and calculation of what to say to best achieve o...
When two people engage in a conversation, knowingly or unknowingly, they are playing a game. Players...
International audienceIn this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infi...
AbstractIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences wit...
I study how to model various strategic interactions with incomplete information and how to properly ...
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doin...
AbstractIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences wit...
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doin...
Item does not contain fulltextIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conver...
In this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences with incons...
This paper refines the game theoretic analysis of conversations in Asher et al. (J Philos Logic 46:3...
International audienceThis paper refines the game theoretic analysis of conversations in Asher et al...
In this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infinite sequential games ...
International audienceIn this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infi...
In this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infinite sequential games ...
Conversations often involve an element of plan�ning and calculation of what to say to best achieve o...
When two people engage in a conversation, knowingly or unknowingly, they are playing a game. Players...
International audienceIn this paper we summarize concepts from earlier work and demonstrate how infi...
AbstractIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences wit...
I study how to model various strategic interactions with incomplete information and how to properly ...
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doin...
AbstractIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences wit...
Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doin...
Item does not contain fulltextIn this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conver...
In this article, a dialogue game is presented in which coherent conversational sequences with incons...