In this new paper for Policy Exchange’s Judicial Power Project, Professor Martin Loughlin of the LSE outlines the failings he perceives in the Supreme Court’s recent prorogation judgment. The paper is framed as the judgment on appeal by an imaginary higher court, which helps to isolate and highlight the Supreme Court’s missteps, central amongst which is its inattention the significance of the Crown in our constitutional scheme and its history. The paper opens with an introduction summarising where and why the Supreme Court went wrong
The thesis deals with prerogative powers and their role in the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from...
In Re an Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review, the Suprem...
This paper critically assesses a recent and significant constitutional change to the British judicia...
The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This pape...
This article considers the recent prorogation litigation, which is encompassed of two legal actions,...
In R (Miller) v Prime Minister (No. 2) the UKSC invalidated an attempted prorogation of Parliament, ...
Tomorrow, on Tuesday 17 September, the UK Supreme Court will be asked to consider appeals from the C...
Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and...
The UK Supreme Court is about to decide the fate of the UK Government’s decision to prorogue Parliam...
This paper questions the continued existence of prerogative as a meaningful juridical category withi...
The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) is a relatively new supreme court, as it started to sit as r...
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful...
Today’s landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the UK has sent yet more shock waves through the B...
Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situatio...
The author suggests that a Scottish takeover of English law in matters of Convention rights has seen...
The thesis deals with prerogative powers and their role in the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from...
In Re an Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review, the Suprem...
This paper critically assesses a recent and significant constitutional change to the British judicia...
The UK Supreme Court held that Parliament had been unlawfully prorogued in September 2019. This pape...
This article considers the recent prorogation litigation, which is encompassed of two legal actions,...
In R (Miller) v Prime Minister (No. 2) the UKSC invalidated an attempted prorogation of Parliament, ...
Tomorrow, on Tuesday 17 September, the UK Supreme Court will be asked to consider appeals from the C...
Examines the grounds on which the Prime Minister's prorogation of Parliament was found unlawful, and...
The UK Supreme Court is about to decide the fate of the UK Government’s decision to prorogue Parliam...
This paper questions the continued existence of prerogative as a meaningful juridical category withi...
The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) is a relatively new supreme court, as it started to sit as r...
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful...
Today’s landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the UK has sent yet more shock waves through the B...
Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situatio...
The author suggests that a Scottish takeover of English law in matters of Convention rights has seen...
The thesis deals with prerogative powers and their role in the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from...
In Re an Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review, the Suprem...
This paper critically assesses a recent and significant constitutional change to the British judicia...